He is innocent until proven guilty under our system, Sir Prize, but the fact that he is a celebrity means facing a trial by public opinion, and given the police appetite for extended periods of arrest/bail, this becomes an extended court of public opinion. Not fair, not right.
But no, I do not think that her comments infer that she is necessarily lying about her statement as you seem to do - rather that, even if the courts found her testimony and what evidence there is uncompelling, she had no assets to make such an action worth taking.