Will Blasphemy Laws Be Reintroduced?
News0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Scarlett. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If you think in terms of 'winning', the North Vietnam and the Communists won.
Strange to think - America with all its military hardware and endless recruits took on a rag-tag army who's idea of a principle to live by was a bowl of rice, shoes made out of old tyres, and political independence. The Viet Cong fought a guerilla war on their own turf using men and women prepared to die for their freedom, against a bunch of conscripts who didn;t know why they were there, and only ever wanted to go home alive - you really could see the result a mile off.
Has America learned the lesson about not forcing its own individual notion of 'freedom' on other cultures? Judging by Iraq - this generation's Vietnam, it would appear not.
The reason I asked is that I am teaching a song from Miss Saigon to my class, and they asked about the politics behind the story. I know roughly the background to the war and why it started and who was on whose side etc, and that the Americans gradually left, but I wasn't sure if there was a conclusion of any kind- an easy answer I could give to my students.
Loosehead- I have no idea what you are implying.
The war was definitely won by the North Vietnamese. It cost them dearly in manpower amd whenever a pitched battle was joined they usually came off second best. However they were skilful manipulators of world opinion and won hands down at the Paris peace talks.
Although they were generally unable to take on the Allies in a pitched battle I would say they were far from a rag tag army. Their leaders down to probably regimental level had fought the Japanese and French previously and and the troops were motivated and skilled in jungle fighting, an area in which the US was sadly lacking.
It became a war of attrition and the US public got sick of it before the Vietnamese.