Hypocrisy Of The Highest Order?
News1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by nikita**. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The problem (and it is affecting all Western countries) is that the age mix has changed over the last 100 years or so.
A 100 years ago not many people lived past 65, and people had many children (because so many died young). This meant that there was about 10 people working for everyone over 65.
Gradually people are having less children, AND people are living longer, so now there is only 2 people working for everyone over 65.
This means that the cost of looking after older people is going up, and the number of people in work paying for it is going down (relatively).
Of course we also live in a society that has more benefits, so it is costing more and more to keep more and more older people.
The simple answer is that the country cannot afford it.
One way round the problem has been to encourage immigration, generally young people, who also tend to have more children.
This in itself is bringing problems, because the birth rate amongst immigrants is higher and they are increasing in number faster than the indiginous population (but that is another matter).
So overall, as a country, it is getting too expensive to give everyone over 65 a pension (plus all the other benefits) so we have to encourage people to either work longer, or have their own pension.