Where Was The Echr In This Case?

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2595232/Mauritian-student-denied-asylum-despite-campaign-let-finish-A-levels-deported-tonight.html

This Mauritian student was deported back to Mauritius last night, and quite rightly so, but the question that must be asked is why are such more promising illegals deported but we can't seem to deport our less desirables?

It had been earlier reported that her mother and siblings will also be deported, but no mention of it in this report.

[Peter Pedant]

decided according to the principles of Fundamental Human Rights

FHR isnt a trump card for everything you know...

Mauritius by the way part of the old British Empire was the only part allowed to have the Code Napoleon as its legal system
I had to share that with you

[naomi24]

How could she appeal to the ECHR? Her own country poses no threat to her and she had no valid reason to stay here.

That said, I wish we could eject less-desirables as easily.

[ladybirder]

Amen to that. ^

[anotheoldgit]

naomi24

/// How could she appeal to the ECHR? Her own country poses no threat to her and she had no valid reason to stay here.///

"Right to a family life", is very often used.

[Peter Pedant]

I havent seen the judgement
there is no doubt that that would havebeen one of the grounds

s 2 rt to family life - isnt a talisman you know

where you say section 2
and the judge says OK I give up....

[naomi24]

As far as I can tell her family has no right to be here either - so once they're all home too they can all live happily together in their own country.

[bazwillrun]

Yet again another case to wonder and ponder in amazement at...

As far as I can make out she is totally harmless and poses no threat whatsoever to our country yet she gets deported, yet we cant ge get rid of muderers ,rapists , thieves etc etc etc
We have untold numbers, millions now, made up of illegals and god knows how many that have have lied and conned us to stay here...yet her, we can get rid off, no problem.

you couldnt make it up, perhaps shed have a better case if she had a pet goldfish !

[andres]

I think that she should have been allowed to finish her A-levels here. By that time the whole family could have been deported together. Seems a bit harsh to split the family .Could understand it if she had been running amok with a machine gun or machete.

[New Judge]

A question that does not seem to have been answered satisfactorily (if at all) is this:

Apparently this young womn entered the UK in 2011 on a six month visitor's visa. Shortly after that she "entered education". How does somebody on a six month visitor's visa and already over the age of compulsory education in the UK mange to "enter education"?

Further, the basis of the family's claim to asylum was extremely thin. Apparently "She had come to the UK with her mother and younger brother and sister from Mauritius in 2011 to escape a relative who was physically abusive."

Just how many people flee to the other side of the world because a relative is threatening them? Sorry, but she and her family had no business here in the first place, she was rightly denied asylum and her deportation was perfectly just.

[emmie]

i too wondered how you arrive in the country on a tourist visa, and end up in full time education, sorry that we can't deport others as quick