My doc also said that 6 was acceptable but 5 was the ideal number. Apparently you can have high HDL (good cholesterol) and low LDL (bad cholesterol) with a reading above 5 and he would be quite happy.
I used to be low risk, until NICE changed the guidelines earlier this year.
The risk is usually measured by using something like a QRISK2 calculator- this takes your age weight cholesterol ratio family history etc. into consideration and gives the percentage risk of cardiovascular disease over the next ten years - and until recently if your risk was 20% or over statins were recommended.
Now it's 10%
http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/pressreleases/NICEAdvisesMuchWiderUseOfStatinsInDdraftGuidance.jsp
and I'm at about 12%, so I am thinking about it.
This is I am afraid a direct result of the bigwigs getting it wrong...
Fiona Godlee ( bless ) the rather stuck up editor of the BMJ should have realised when Sir Rory Collins said there was something wrong with the two letters three months ago....
that there might be ( something wrong with the letters )
but silly girl let it ride..... [ and seemed to have instead to have ignored it ]
Statins seem very safe - minimal side effects in 100 000 people taking them.....
Sir Rory C wiped the floor with Fiona G on radio 4 this morning
and I am not surprised the spat has gone viral.
So far Sir Rory C is out in front by far - they seem very safe.
I have said before that I had chronic muscle problems on Simvastatin. The GP changed the make and I take 40mg Fluvastatin daily, with no ill effects at all. A change of diet and weight loss has brought my cholesterol down to 5.6 at last measurement, so the prognosis is much better now.
I got painful arm muscles so I came off them. The first thing the doc said when I reported the pain was "Are you on statins?" She said it was not uncommon.