Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > Rebekah Brooks.....not Guilty

Rebekah Brooks.....not Guilty

Avatar Image
ummmm | 12:31 Tue 24th Jun 2014 | News
36 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27997688

What do you reckon Mikey?
prev Hacking Trial Verdicts...
  
next I Wish He Was The Head At My Kids School.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Avatar Image
Zeuhl
Best Answer
Indeed Chill You and I probably thought the computers and files Rebekah, Charlie and the Security Guard got rid of and his in the underground car park just before the Police arrived were somehow suspicious. You and I probably thought a senior executive should know what the regular large payments they were signing off were for But I suppose we were wrong
13:38 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Go To Best Answer
Avatar Image ChillDoubt
LOL, indeed Zeuhl.
And a I've said on the other thread, there is NO WAY they would have discussed any of this during 'pillow talk'.
13:42 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image askyourgran
Justice is seen to have been served. And Mikey will probably be devastated after all this long wait.
13:42 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image Zeuhl
Chill

I don't think Rebekah allows any talking!
13:44 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image ChillDoubt
Absolutely not Zeuhl! Any woman who can give Ross Kemp a hiding is feisty, knows what she wants and undoubtedly gets it.
She probably rode Coulson like a Metropolitan Police horse.
Ooh, did I just type that out loud.....?
13:50 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image askyourgran
Lol Chill I was about to say that she is not the type to lay down and take it, but I thought better of it.
13:53 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image viv38
^ LOL LOL
13:54 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image royfromaus
Is anyone else a bit worried just how badly mikey has taken the news?
13:57 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image douglas9401
Horses for courses I suppose.
14:34 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image Quizmonster
A year ago, almost to the day, Coulson was charged with perjury at a Scottish hearing in a different case. Originally, the press was banned from reporting on it but that was later rescinded. I'm puzzled as to why we have heard nothing of it since. Presumably, we've been waiting for the current Old Bailey trial to end. Now it has, isn't it time he was bustled northwards to face the next piece of music?
15:17 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image Peter Pedant
I suppose it is possible to break the chain of who-knew....

I wonder who her defence lawyer was.....
15:20 Tue 24th Jun 2014
-- answer removed --
Avatar Image Jomlett
\\I wonder who her defence lawyer was//

Jonathan Laidlaw QC replaceed John Kelsey-Fry QC as Brooks’ defence counsel last year and ALL her defence cost are paid by Rupert Murdoch

15:24 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image Peter Pedant
well as AOG might say - not guilty means they didnt do it...

I am reminded that President Clinton memorably said - 'I did NOT have sex with that woman...' so he couldnt have
two points arise - 1) he had been advised that what he had been doing wasnt er s+x
2) the woman in question Monica L was not Rebekah B
15:25 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image Peter Pedant
Jomo thx

They say that a lawyer is as good as his last case
so Mr Laidlaw QC can look forward to a full appointments book ....
15:26 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image Lindylou
How in heaven's name did she get away with this??!
18:53 Tue 24th Jun 2014
Avatar Image mikey4444
Lindylou...in answer to your question, you only have to look at the post above yours tonight, from PP !
20:14 Tue 24th Jun 2014

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Rebekah Brooks.....not Guilty

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.