ChatterBank1 min ago
What Is Going Off Here, Is All This Fair?
11 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-27 03153/F ormer-h ead-soc ial-ser vices-B aby-P-c ouncil- Sharon- Shoemit h-wins- 679-000 -pay-un fair-di smissal .html
The head of social services who was sacked over the 'Baby P' case is awarded a £679,000 pay-out for unfair dismissal, and the little tot's mother who was jailed indefinitely in 2009, was let out in October following a second Parole Board review of her case.
Read more: http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-27 03153/F ormer-h ead-soc ial-ser vices-B aby-P-c ouncil- Sharon- Shoemit h-wins- 679-000 -pay-un fair-di smissal .html#i xzz38NN t9VEb
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
The head of social services who was sacked over the 'Baby P' case is awarded a £679,000 pay-out for unfair dismissal, and the little tot's mother who was jailed indefinitely in 2009, was let out in October following a second Parole Board review of her case.
Read more: http://
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Simple.
There are laws about how to dismiss people, and in her case the law was broken. So she is due money for being incorrectly sacked.
This should be a lesson to all Ministers who pander to the rage of the tabloids and break the law in their haste to get a few votes. Ministers are not above the law and Ed Balls acted recklessly.
There are laws about how to dismiss people, and in her case the law was broken. So she is due money for being incorrectly sacked.
This should be a lesson to all Ministers who pander to the rage of the tabloids and break the law in their haste to get a few votes. Ministers are not above the law and Ed Balls acted recklessly.
She was awarded the cash because she was unfairly dismissed. This was mainly because Ed Balls (the "Children's Secretary" at the time - whatever that might be) refused to follow advice and adopt the proper procedures for her dismissal. It was a great piece of PR for him at the time (as he was seen to be "doing something") and the good burghers of Harringey subsequently picked up the bill.
// Is All This Fair? //
No. She was crap at her job, and needed sacking. Balls didn't follow due procedure though, so we've arrived at the situation where a child's tragic death has turned into a lottery win for someone who didn't actually deserve a penny.
I'd like to think she feels a good deal of guilt and shame over the whole affair, but I'm fairly certain she feels neither.
No. She was crap at her job, and needed sacking. Balls didn't follow due procedure though, so we've arrived at the situation where a child's tragic death has turned into a lottery win for someone who didn't actually deserve a penny.
I'd like to think she feels a good deal of guilt and shame over the whole affair, but I'm fairly certain she feels neither.