Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Farage Has To Apologise Yet Again !
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-kent- 2885336 7
I am on record here as feeling somewhat sorry for Farage....you know...herding cats and all that. But just when it looked as if it had all gone quiet on the UKIP front, along comes another of his daft Members, this time a woman, and spoils it all again. Still, its an opportunity for Farage to get into the media again, so maybe its not so bad after all. Just to remind everybody what this daft UKIP MEP actually said :::
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-28841 018
I am on record here as feeling somewhat sorry for Farage....you know...herding cats and all that. But just when it looked as if it had all gone quiet on the UKIP front, along comes another of his daft Members, this time a woman, and spoils it all again. Still, its an opportunity for Farage to get into the media again, so maybe its not so bad after all. Just to remind everybody what this daft UKIP MEP actually said :::
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Retrochic - "andy-hughes I think the underlying problem with UKIP is that its recruiting people who have a passion rather than an Education ..."
An interesting point - though not one which will stand up to close scrutiny i fear.
Passion is perfectly desireable and acceptable in anyone in public life, but simply to have passion, and be absent in other vital areas of cultural awareness will simply not cut it.
If an MEP was selected and elected because they were passionate,but they were unable to eat with a kife and fork, they would not be acceptable in political or social circles.
By being able enough to secure enough votes to be an MEP, the lady in question should have been able to allow the electorate to take for granted that she knows enough to think before she speaks.
An interesting point - though not one which will stand up to close scrutiny i fear.
Passion is perfectly desireable and acceptable in anyone in public life, but simply to have passion, and be absent in other vital areas of cultural awareness will simply not cut it.
If an MEP was selected and elected because they were passionate,but they were unable to eat with a kife and fork, they would not be acceptable in political or social circles.
By being able enough to secure enough votes to be an MEP, the lady in question should have been able to allow the electorate to take for granted that she knows enough to think before she speaks.
andy An MEP with good table manners and the ability to walk upright should of course be taken for granted. Passion coupled with Education is a great thing, but until UKIP becomes more acceptable or popular to the more 'Academic' candidates, then they will have to put up with the UKIP equivalent of the Tories 'Hooray Henries'
"Some people need to go read the actual definition of Racism..... "
Unfortunately, retro, as a result of the often preposterous seventy recommendations contained in the Macpherson report into the handling by the Metropolitan Police of their investigation into the death of Stephen Lawrence a "racist incident" has a far wider interpretation than many people think. Recommendation number 12 of that report (seen by some as "the defining moment in British race relations") says this:
"A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person"
So it doesn't matter what the alleged victim of these heinous name calling incidents think, nor does it matter what those investigating such incidents think. "Any other person" also has a say and it is their perception that can hold sway, never mind the facts.
Yes a defining moment indeed.
Unfortunately, retro, as a result of the often preposterous seventy recommendations contained in the Macpherson report into the handling by the Metropolitan Police of their investigation into the death of Stephen Lawrence a "racist incident" has a far wider interpretation than many people think. Recommendation number 12 of that report (seen by some as "the defining moment in British race relations") says this:
"A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person"
So it doesn't matter what the alleged victim of these heinous name calling incidents think, nor does it matter what those investigating such incidents think. "Any other person" also has a say and it is their perception that can hold sway, never mind the facts.
Yes a defining moment indeed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.