Zacs

[Tilly2]

you ok? Again!

[ummmm]

I suppose it depends which MOD is present.

[gness]

I think you could be suspended for questioning inconsistency.....☺

[scorpiojo]

;o)

[Tilly2]

Well, if I disappear, you'll know where I 've gone........and why.

That's exactly my point, ummmm. I shouldn't depend on who's about. That is not a fair system.

[Svejk]

you should give me your e-mail address, tilly, in case/for when you are banned. ;o)

[boxtops]

I don't think it does depend on who's about, does it? I seem to remember Ed saying a while ago that if a thread was reported which was in fact OK, he would reinstate it. Ed has the final word, after all.

[Svejk]

or me, of course.

[Tilly2]

Ha!

[Tilly2]

So are you saying, boxy that I should email the Ed and ask for the thread to be reinstated?

[Svejk]

I meant it. ;-(

[ummmm]

I think he said he reviews the deleted threads and if he deems them okay he'll reinstate them.

[boxtops]

Yeah, what ummm says - or if not, he'll tell you why it was taken off (but we do know he doesn't like threads about deleted threads)

[jno]

but if it was filled to the gunwales with piratical oaths it will probably stay deleted.

The unfairness is that other unnecessarily vernacular threads linger on; but that's probably just because nobody who sees them reports them. And that's not really unfairness, it's just bad luck.

[Tilly2]

But luck shouldn't come into it, jno. If there are rules, they should be adhered to. I know what you are saying though. Some days it's ok, other days it isn't

[woofgang]

Well but Tilly its like speeding, its always against the law but luck does come into whether you are caught or not for the same reason which is insufficient observers.