ChatterBank2 mins ago
Jihadist Islamofascists
35 Answers
Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland never had a mandate for their atrocities from the New Testament, whereas JIF's most certainly do have a mandate from the Koran and their paedophile prophet Mohammed.
Ordinary law abiding integrated Muslims do not follow the true teaching of the Koran, which is to wage Jihad by whatever means on the rest of us.
I have condemned them on this site many times over the years, and Iregret not one word of all I have ever said on the subject.
It is worse now than even I ever imagined, and I always imagined it would be a continuous escalation of violence and more and more submission and appeasement in a futile attempt to keep Muslims in the UK content.
Do you still believe the Muslim claim that Islam is a religion of peace?
Ordinary law abiding integrated Muslims do not follow the true teaching of the Koran, which is to wage Jihad by whatever means on the rest of us.
I have condemned them on this site many times over the years, and Iregret not one word of all I have ever said on the subject.
It is worse now than even I ever imagined, and I always imagined it would be a continuous escalation of violence and more and more submission and appeasement in a futile attempt to keep Muslims in the UK content.
Do you still believe the Muslim claim that Islam is a religion of peace?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Khandro, let's hope these protests people keep posting will have an influence on this lot - but I'm not holding my breath. (Scroll down for polls).
http://
Interestingly, I watched a Muslim spokesman pleading with IS to release hostage Alan Henning. He said he could personally vouch for Mr Henning. What a strange thing to say. The spokesman clearly knows Mr Henning personally, but why would he feel the need to 'vouch' for him rather than condemn the actions of IS and demand Mr Henning's release for the right reasons?
http://
Interestingly, I watched a Muslim spokesman pleading with IS to release hostage Alan Henning. He said he could personally vouch for Mr Henning. What a strange thing to say. The spokesman clearly knows Mr Henning personally, but why would he feel the need to 'vouch' for him rather than condemn the actions of IS and demand Mr Henning's release for the right reasons?
naomi; yes I read through it, some really silly assertions, such as Muslims would like their country of residence to be predominately Muslim, well they would wouldn't they? That would apply to most religions I think.
Also we don't know who or in what circumstances these surveys were done, so they are rather meaningless.
An interesting fact in today's BBC news page about surveys might interest you.
http://
Also we don't know who or in what circumstances these surveys were done, so they are rather meaningless.
An interesting fact in today's BBC news page about surveys might interest you.
http://
Khandro, //some really silly assertions, such as Muslims would like their country of residence to be predominately Muslim, well they would wouldn't they?//
Why silly? Many of them would like the country they reside in to be predominately Muslim – but these are our countries they’re talking about, not their own. Are you willing to concede your country to Islam?
//Also we don't know who or in what circumstances these surveys were done, so they are rather meaningless.//
The names of the organisations conducting the surveys are published quite clearly.
As for your link, in this particular instance unless the surveys were conducted by lslamic extremists, I doubt very much that Muslims would say they support terrorist actions if they don’t.
You’re an apologist, Khandro, with your head stuck blindly in the sand.
Why silly? Many of them would like the country they reside in to be predominately Muslim – but these are our countries they’re talking about, not their own. Are you willing to concede your country to Islam?
//Also we don't know who or in what circumstances these surveys were done, so they are rather meaningless.//
The names of the organisations conducting the surveys are published quite clearly.
As for your link, in this particular instance unless the surveys were conducted by lslamic extremists, I doubt very much that Muslims would say they support terrorist actions if they don’t.
You’re an apologist, Khandro, with your head stuck blindly in the sand.
naomi; // Are you willing to concede your country to Islam? //
Not at all, but it's not about me. JW's would like everyone to be like them too, but I wouldn't particularly want that either.
Surveys ask people what they[i would like. If asked what would [i]you] say? - or is that worthy of seperate thread? :0)
Not at all, but it's not about me. JW's would like everyone to be like them too, but I wouldn't particularly want that either.
Surveys ask people what they[i would like. If asked what would [i]you] say? - or is that worthy of seperate thread? :0)
Khandro, JWs are concerned with the next world – they have no ambition to conquer and rule this one. The rational among us are pretty safe from their madness.
These surveys weren’t predominately designed to ask people what they would like – they were designed, in the main, to assess the numbers of Muslims who support the actions of fundamentalist Islam.
These surveys weren’t predominately designed to ask people what they would like – they were designed, in the main, to assess the numbers of Muslims who support the actions of fundamentalist Islam.
Khandro
I wouldn't be too impressed with Muslims speaking out against terrorism suddenly. It is known as "self preservation". Germany has a record of dealing with groups of people who don't toe the line. I seem to recall many hostels and ghettoes mysteriously going up in flames. They contained errr Turkish muslims.
If governments in our countries tow the line of PC and pander to muslims whilst gagging their own people who speak out against their savage practises and sharia law.While children are being indoctrinated and radicalised in our British schools then the Muslims can,eventually,expect a backlash. They have said too little too late.
I wouldn't be too impressed with Muslims speaking out against terrorism suddenly. It is known as "self preservation". Germany has a record of dealing with groups of people who don't toe the line. I seem to recall many hostels and ghettoes mysteriously going up in flames. They contained errr Turkish muslims.
If governments in our countries tow the line of PC and pander to muslims whilst gagging their own people who speak out against their savage practises and sharia law.While children are being indoctrinated and radicalised in our British schools then the Muslims can,eventually,expect a backlash. They have said too little too late.
Khandro, the act is possibly negated to a degree by the motivation. In the face of all the atrocities that have gone, unchallenged, before – and in fact often supported - despite years of expectation, the voice of moderate Islam has remained elusive. Silence. But suddenly IS looms, the world recognises it as a menace like no other, world powers oppose it, and curiously the men of Islam suddenly find their voices. Call me sceptical if you like, but one can’t help suspecting that their eleventh hour response is rather too little too late, and for some at least, no more than an exercise in damage limitation.
Respecting the laws of other people's countries certainly isn't high up the list of their priorities…
--
Economist (Pew 2013): 74% who favor Islamic law in Egypt say it should apply to non-Muslims as well.
http://
WZB Berlin Social Science Center: 65% of Muslims in Europe say Sharia is more important than the law of the country they live in.
http://
http://
If this attitude is anything to go by, they have no respect for our ways or customs and even use catch-all terms like "westerners" prior to expressing their contempt for us. They're the mirror image of Daily Mail readers, if you like, with the crucial difference that they act out the stonings, amputations and beheadings. DMers are decent enough to only want people they disdain to be disembarked from the isle.
--
Economist (Pew 2013): 74% who favor Islamic law in Egypt say it should apply to non-Muslims as well.
http://
WZB Berlin Social Science Center: 65% of Muslims in Europe say Sharia is more important than the law of the country they live in.
http://
http://
If this attitude is anything to go by, they have no respect for our ways or customs and even use catch-all terms like "westerners" prior to expressing their contempt for us. They're the mirror image of Daily Mail readers, if you like, with the crucial difference that they act out the stonings, amputations and beheadings. DMers are decent enough to only want people they disdain to be disembarked from the isle.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank4 mins ago
Arts & Literature9 mins ago
Body & Soul11 mins ago
Editor's Blog32 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles36 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.