ChatterBank1 min ago
Libyan Can Sue British Government Over Rendition
7 Answers
Don't youo think this man should actually be suing Tony Blair and Jack Straw personally. This was part of Blairs "sweetheart deal" with Gadaffi when they were kissing in the desert in 2004. Part of the deal was also freeing the Lockerbie bomber if I recollect. Why should the taxpayer cover the bill for what is clearly a just case as this man was collateral damage in Blair's great scheme of things.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lindapalmara. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// This was part of Blairs "sweetheart deal" with Gadaffi //
No it was't.
It was part of the Blair's sweetheart deal with Bush. (Tony, do everything I say)
Rendition is a polite word for abduction. If we did indeed kidnap this man, which is illegal in UK law, then he has a case.
Blair and Straw were acting in their roles as Government Ministers. They were probably acting illegally by abducting people, but we seem to have forgiven them (or at least, we ourselves have never brought them to book).
No it was't.
It was part of the Blair's sweetheart deal with Bush. (Tony, do everything I say)
Rendition is a polite word for abduction. If we did indeed kidnap this man, which is illegal in UK law, then he has a case.
Blair and Straw were acting in their roles as Government Ministers. They were probably acting illegally by abducting people, but we seem to have forgiven them (or at least, we ourselves have never brought them to book).
// Don't youo think this man should actually be suing Tony Blair and Jack Straw personally.//
No I dont
these two were definitely acting in a governmental capacity and so 'we' have to pay for their misdeeds - if any
in the 'good old days' you couldnt sue ministers
but all that changed with the Crown Proceedings Act 1935
and yes I do think they should sue so that the next time someone says, can you send so-and-so to X-ville so we can torture him indefinitely and in secret, the minister says No
The min should say: no because it is immoral and repugnant to Gods Law
but even if he says: "no because if they find out they will sue the *** off me" is good enough
No I dont
these two were definitely acting in a governmental capacity and so 'we' have to pay for their misdeeds - if any
in the 'good old days' you couldnt sue ministers
but all that changed with the Crown Proceedings Act 1935
and yes I do think they should sue so that the next time someone says, can you send so-and-so to X-ville so we can torture him indefinitely and in secret, the minister says No
The min should say: no because it is immoral and repugnant to Gods Law
but even if he says: "no because if they find out they will sue the *** off me" is good enough
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.