ChatterBank8 mins ago
Strictly Dancing on BBC
I took our friend Dot's advice and watched the programme tonight, despite Graham Norton hosting it! Ugggghhh!!!!
What I canot understand is, that all the couples put in great performances. Apart from the final couple, most of the marks fell in the 20-26 category.
Considering there are 40 points available for each routine, how come they are only getting aroud 50 to 70% of the maximum. They perform very well and surely are worth a lot more than they get.
Wouldn't it be a good idea if the so-called 'experts' got up of their butts and showed us how it should be done, and demonstrate what a full 100% performance is like. Or maybe even they themselves are just has beens or wanabees. Great show, good entertainment but definitely dodgy judges (2 out of 10) and a paethic host (zero).
By the way - good luck to Dot's Paul . . . .
By the way - good luck to Dot's Paul . . . . . .
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As mentioned, I assume the intention is for the standard to keep improving and by the end have two or three couples that are of a very impressive standard. Giving high scores now would make it less 'interesting' watching these couple improving and getting better marks. Am rooting for Darrien and Hollie and of course, Dot's Paul and Aravon!