News0 min ago
Hr - Redundancy Advice Please
7 Answers
Afternoon All,
Looking for a bit of advice if I may on a HR technicality. If there are any HR knowledgeable AB'ers about, your comments would be greatly appreciated.
My OH has been given notice of his 30 day consultation period as his job is 'at risk of redundancy'. (Now we all know that this means the job will in fact be made redundant).
He has been offered the statutory redundancy payout, which is fine. However, the point I wanted to check is this:
He has not been offered another job within the company, nor has he been offered a transfer role, however there is a new (company restructure) job which they think he would suit which will also be advertised externally so he will have to apply for it and it has not been offered to him directly.
If he chooses to apply for the job and is successful, he will not get any redundancy payout. If he applies for the role and is unsuccessful, he will get the redundancy payout.
However, as the role has not yet been externally advertised both the application and closing dates for the job will fall after the 30 days consultation period at which point his role will be redundant.
Should the company in this case make him redundant, give him the statutory payout and then if he wants to, he can apply for the job as the application/ closing dates fall after the date in which he needs to tell the company his decision (if he wants to take redundancy or apply for the role).
It just seems a bit strange as if he decides to apply for the new job, there will be a gap in between where he will have no job, so surely this means he is redundant at that time?
Just a thought, and any informed advice would be great (our heads are spinning from the news as it was out of the blue)
Thanks in advance
Peas
Looking for a bit of advice if I may on a HR technicality. If there are any HR knowledgeable AB'ers about, your comments would be greatly appreciated.
My OH has been given notice of his 30 day consultation period as his job is 'at risk of redundancy'. (Now we all know that this means the job will in fact be made redundant).
He has been offered the statutory redundancy payout, which is fine. However, the point I wanted to check is this:
He has not been offered another job within the company, nor has he been offered a transfer role, however there is a new (company restructure) job which they think he would suit which will also be advertised externally so he will have to apply for it and it has not been offered to him directly.
If he chooses to apply for the job and is successful, he will not get any redundancy payout. If he applies for the role and is unsuccessful, he will get the redundancy payout.
However, as the role has not yet been externally advertised both the application and closing dates for the job will fall after the 30 days consultation period at which point his role will be redundant.
Should the company in this case make him redundant, give him the statutory payout and then if he wants to, he can apply for the job as the application/ closing dates fall after the date in which he needs to tell the company his decision (if he wants to take redundancy or apply for the role).
It just seems a bit strange as if he decides to apply for the new job, there will be a gap in between where he will have no job, so surely this means he is redundant at that time?
Just a thought, and any informed advice would be great (our heads are spinning from the news as it was out of the blue)
Thanks in advance
Peas
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Peaspeculiars. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.