News4 mins ago
Paying Damages
19 Answers
Hello All
Following on from a question I asked lst week.
If a court have award myself damages from an individual who vandalised my car but that person is out of work and receives unemployment benefits (or whatever it is called nowadays) and has not paid in the allocated time, can they take the money out of his benefits to pay the debt?
Many thanks
Following on from a question I asked lst week.
If a court have award myself damages from an individual who vandalised my car but that person is out of work and receives unemployment benefits (or whatever it is called nowadays) and has not paid in the allocated time, can they take the money out of his benefits to pay the debt?
Many thanks
Answers
Courts can make an attachment of earnings order so I don't see why they cannot make an attachment of benefits order.
17:09 Mon 06th Apr 2015
um ... no I have never tried that ....
but the court hasnt awarded damages to you - have they?
you would need a further court order for it ( I think, never having tried it )
and I cant imagine the court would grant one ( they have fact they have a power doesnt mean they will use it )
Even a judge whilst you were fuming in a corner (of the court) would remind you of the futility of pursuing a 'man of straw'
oh, the answer is no in Amerikee
//Garnishment is an American legal order for collecting a monetary judgment on behalf ... garnishment; Creditors cannot garnish wages for social security benefits, ...//
and I cant find anything on the internet for the UK
so I think the answer is no here as well ....
but the court hasnt awarded damages to you - have they?
you would need a further court order for it ( I think, never having tried it )
and I cant imagine the court would grant one ( they have fact they have a power doesnt mean they will use it )
Even a judge whilst you were fuming in a corner (of the court) would remind you of the futility of pursuing a 'man of straw'
oh, the answer is no in Amerikee
//Garnishment is an American legal order for collecting a monetary judgment on behalf ... garnishment; Creditors cannot garnish wages for social security benefits, ...//
and I cant find anything on the internet for the UK
so I think the answer is no here as well ....
-- answer removed --
You can for court fines:
http:// www.new ham.gov .uk/Pag es/Serv iceChil d/Stage -5-How- do-I-de al-with -priori ty-debt s-Magis trates- Court-f ines.as px
but I am still not sure if you can for civil awards
or else you wouldnt have that exciting programme -- the sheriffs would you ?
http://
but I am still not sure if you can for civil awards
or else you wouldnt have that exciting programme -- the sheriffs would you ?
If compensation was awarded as a result of a criminal conviction (I assume this was a case of criminal damage judging from your first question) then the court decides how it (along with any fines, prosecution costs and victim surcharge) will be paid. Where the defendant is in receipt of benefits the most that a court can order is for the sum to be paid at the rate of £5 per week. This can be collected directly from benefits but, as hc correctly points out, this can only be done by agreement and it cannot be done where certain benefits are being paid (though straightforward "Job Seekers" allowance is not a problem. Otherwise the defendant is responsible for making the payments at the agreed rate. When payments are made compensation takes priority over any other charges.
You do not have the authority to instruct bailiffs to collect the debt as technically it is owed to the court, not to you. However, at the time of sentencing the court should have made a “collection order”. This means that if payments are not made as ordered then action can be taken to recover the sum without the matter being returned to court.
In short it is up to the court to collect your compensation and their process will follow up the matter if payments are not made as ordered.
You do not have the authority to instruct bailiffs to collect the debt as technically it is owed to the court, not to you. However, at the time of sentencing the court should have made a “collection order”. This means that if payments are not made as ordered then action can be taken to recover the sum without the matter being returned to court.
In short it is up to the court to collect your compensation and their process will follow up the matter if payments are not made as ordered.
thx for a straightforward answer NJ
One of my tenants was fined ( peanuts) for a breaking a non-molestation order and didnt pay (of course), and they just kept on arresting him ( and bailing him ). we as onlookers were meant to applaud the p'lice for doing a swonderful job, but we all thought: God what a pointless and expensive waste of resources, dont they have anything else to do ?
No they didnt
One of my tenants was fined ( peanuts) for a breaking a non-molestation order and didnt pay (of course), and they just kept on arresting him ( and bailing him ). we as onlookers were meant to applaud the p'lice for doing a swonderful job, but we all thought: God what a pointless and expensive waste of resources, dont they have anything else to do ?
No they didnt
Sorry I see he has been convicted and ordered to pay.
There is little you can do to enforce payment, an attatchment of earnings/benefit order can only be made for fines. Sending baliffs will just cost you even more money as you have to pay a fee to get another court order to send them. They will not be able to recover any money if he has no money and no property worth taking.
There is little you can do to enforce payment, an attatchment of earnings/benefit order can only be made for fines. Sending baliffs will just cost you even more money as you have to pay a fee to get another court order to send them. They will not be able to recover any money if he has no money and no property worth taking.