ChatterBank7 mins ago
Should Celebraties Be Above The Law?
13 Answers
http:// news.sk y.com/s tory/14 83604/d epps-do gs-must -leave- austral ia-or-f ace-dea th
Good on the Australian government, I for one am sick of this so called 'celebratory culture'.
//
"Just because he's Johnny Depp does not mean he's exempt from Australian law," Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce said.
"There is a process if you want to bring animals - you get the permits, they go into quarantine and then you can have them.
"It's time that Pistol and Boo buggered off back to the United States.
//
And can anyone tell me why a petition has been setup for the dogs not to be destroyed?
It's quite simple, they wont be destroyed if Depp complies with the law and takes them out of the country. If they are destroyed it will be Depps fault not the Australian Government.
Good on the Australian government, I for one am sick of this so called 'celebratory culture'.
//
"Just because he's Johnny Depp does not mean he's exempt from Australian law," Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce said.
"There is a process if you want to bring animals - you get the permits, they go into quarantine and then you can have them.
"It's time that Pistol and Boo buggered off back to the United States.
//
And can anyone tell me why a petition has been setup for the dogs not to be destroyed?
It's quite simple, they wont be destroyed if Depp complies with the law and takes them out of the country. If they are destroyed it will be Depps fault not the Australian Government.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's true that Johnny Depp is not above the law - but nothing in the report suggests that he thinks he is.
There is no statement from Mr Depp advising that, in view of his status as a film star, he should be allowed to flout the law on this occasion - the only reason that this is news is because of his fame, which is not something he sought, or could be said to exploit in any meaningful way.
So this is a puff piece on a slow news day, and not worth getting het up about.
There is no statement from Mr Depp advising that, in view of his status as a film star, he should be allowed to flout the law on this occasion - the only reason that this is news is because of his fame, which is not something he sought, or could be said to exploit in any meaningful way.
So this is a puff piece on a slow news day, and not worth getting het up about.
I was wondering that too, sandyRoe. I doubt he flew in in a stealth plane and landed in the middle of the Nullarbor so he could sneak his dogs in (though it could have happened). If they were allowed in they should stay, assuming they're not frothing at the mouth: if they've been there for weeks and not killed any babies or worried any sheep, I don't know that there's any point in throwing them out now.
But perhaps because their owners are celebs, the government wants to be seen to be taking a tough line.
But perhaps because their owners are celebs, the government wants to be seen to be taking a tough line.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.