Home & Garden3 mins ago
Should Alistair Carmicheal Resign
19 Answers
Should alistair carmicheal resign after admitting he tried to discredit Nicola Sturgeon
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gordiescotland1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
He was just plying the usual game of politics.
However I'm mystified as to why he would want to discredit Nicola Sturgeon. Since the Conservative party stood no chance of success in Scotland, the most important thing for them was to see Labour fail miserably there; so it was actually in the interests of the Conservaives that the SNP should do well in Scotland.
However I'm mystified as to why he would want to discredit Nicola Sturgeon. Since the Conservative party stood no chance of success in Scotland, the most important thing for them was to see Labour fail miserably there; so it was actually in the interests of the Conservaives that the SNP should do well in Scotland.
Quite clearly 'dirty tricks' which reflects badly on Alistair Carmichael and his discreditted Party. But it is not a resigning his seat issue. If the SNP were serious, they would report him to the ele torial Commission and they haven't.
I was puzzled by this statement from Carmichael:
// "I should not have agreed this. It was an error of judgment which I regret. //
That seems to imply that he was put up to the smear by someone else (presumably more senior). The Inquiry into the matter does reveal who he "agreed this" with, so one has to ask how thorough the inquiry was, and conclude that it was a whitewash.
I was puzzled by this statement from Carmichael:
// "I should not have agreed this. It was an error of judgment which I regret. //
That seems to imply that he was put up to the smear by someone else (presumably more senior). The Inquiry into the matter does reveal who he "agreed this" with, so one has to ask how thorough the inquiry was, and conclude that it was a whitewash.
The investigation costing a reported £1.4 million(!!!) found the original memo was written in good faith but it is the lie that is the issue. He is, as far as I'm aware, an Elder in the Church of Scotland still (a not insignificant position) and at the time, he was Secretary of State for Scotland. Had he been an S of S still, it would have been a resignation issue but other than his decision not to accept the payment he is entitled to, he has suffered no penalty.
His lying has cost him his reputation, it cast doubt on the First Minister and more importantly to some no doubt, it cost £1.4 million to investigate. If he believes the electorate has faith in him, he should put that to the test by resigning as MP and standing for re - election.
His lying has cost him his reputation, it cast doubt on the First Minister and more importantly to some no doubt, it cost £1.4 million to investigate. If he believes the electorate has faith in him, he should put that to the test by resigning as MP and standing for re - election.
Surely it would have been agreed at the high level talks when it was decided to leak the info that he would take the fall and be quietly ushered back later should it all hit the fan ?
Anyway I'm unsure what he hoped to gain. Voters were unlikely to vote Lib or even Con should they opt not to look after regional self interest instead of UK interest, at the ballot box. And surely he didn't want them to turn to Lab ?
Anyway I'm unsure what he hoped to gain. Voters were unlikely to vote Lib or even Con should they opt not to look after regional self interest instead of UK interest, at the ballot box. And surely he didn't want them to turn to Lab ?
WR......I am with you there. But when the LibDems signed that pact with the Devil in 2010, they paved the way for what happened on May 7th.
And if they don't buck their ideas up, they will be like the old Liberal party in the 50's, 60's and 70's....just also-rans, irrelevant, and nobody much will give a toss.
If you look at the evidence in the West Country at the Election, it obvious that legions of people that voted LibDem in 2010, transferred their votes to the Tories. Difficult to really understand, but without doubt, that is what happened.
And if they don't buck their ideas up, they will be like the old Liberal party in the 50's, 60's and 70's....just also-rans, irrelevant, and nobody much will give a toss.
If you look at the evidence in the West Country at the Election, it obvious that legions of people that voted LibDem in 2010, transferred their votes to the Tories. Difficult to really understand, but without doubt, that is what happened.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.