Quizzes & Puzzles75 mins ago
Do Mps Deserve A 10 Per Cent Pay Rise?
17 Answers
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/new stopics /mps-ex penses/ 1164569 1/MPs-p ay-rise -justif ied-by- economi c-recov ery-exp enses-w atchdog -claims .html
/// Ipsa has published an analysis of "economic indicators" including rising national income, declining inflation, increasing employment and a 3.3 per cent rise in average wages. ///
If the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) deem it necessary to grant the politicians a 10% pay rise, and since every worker and tax payer have been instrumental in making the UK economically healthy, why aren't they entitled to a similar wage rise?
/// Ipsa has published an analysis of "economic indicators" including rising national income, declining inflation, increasing employment and a 3.3 per cent rise in average wages. ///
If the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) deem it necessary to grant the politicians a 10% pay rise, and since every worker and tax payer have been instrumental in making the UK economically healthy, why aren't they entitled to a similar wage rise?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Actually there's two.
Yes, I believe they do. I feel our MPs are underpaid.
I always get slightly irritated when a comparison is drawn between MPs salaries and (purely for the sake of the argument) nurses. There are tens of thousands of nurses and 650 odd MPs. you cannot compare a 10% payrise for MPs to, say, a 2% payrise for nurses. Its an utterly pointless and futile comparison.
I'd go further....reduce the number of MPs to, say, 400, pay them £250,000 a year to be 'professional' MPs and therefore no disappearing off to their Inns or Boards.
Yes, I believe they do. I feel our MPs are underpaid.
I always get slightly irritated when a comparison is drawn between MPs salaries and (purely for the sake of the argument) nurses. There are tens of thousands of nurses and 650 odd MPs. you cannot compare a 10% payrise for MPs to, say, a 2% payrise for nurses. Its an utterly pointless and futile comparison.
I'd go further....reduce the number of MPs to, say, 400, pay them £250,000 a year to be 'professional' MPs and therefore no disappearing off to their Inns or Boards.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.