ChatterBank0 min ago
Ken Clarke Sex Abuse Accuser Ben Fellows Is Cleared
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-birmi ngham-3 3724010
I am confused here. Fellows was charged with perverting the course of justice. But the Jury in his case has now found him to be not guilty.
So where does that leave us ? If the Jury believed him, than it should follow that they believed that he WAS groped by Ken Clarke.
More to the point, where does this leave Clarke ?
I am confused here. Fellows was charged with perverting the course of justice. But the Jury in his case has now found him to be not guilty.
So where does that leave us ? If the Jury believed him, than it should follow that they believed that he WAS groped by Ken Clarke.
More to the point, where does this leave Clarke ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Very odd, don't know quite what to think. It seemed obvious that Fellows was a fantasist. ~The jury thought differently and may have had access to information which we don't.
I've never liked Ken Clarke, but this leaves him in a very difficult position - to be honest, my deep- feeling is that he doesn't deserve to be in this position.
I've never liked Ken Clarke, but this leaves him in a very difficult position - to be honest, my deep- feeling is that he doesn't deserve to be in this position.
more to the point
Mikey should be asking why he doesnt understand more about the principles of English criminal law
They didnt prove Ben F perverted the course of justice beyond reasonable doubt
why did they bring the case ? because they thought they could ( prove it beyond reasonable doubt )
Does it mean that mystic meg and ken clarke are secret lovers ? nope
does it mean Ken or Ben or Mrs Mopp lied ? nope
does it mean that it will rain tomorrow ? nope
and so on and so on
Mikey should be asking why he doesnt understand more about the principles of English criminal law
They didnt prove Ben F perverted the course of justice beyond reasonable doubt
why did they bring the case ? because they thought they could ( prove it beyond reasonable doubt )
Does it mean that mystic meg and ken clarke are secret lovers ? nope
does it mean Ken or Ben or Mrs Mopp lied ? nope
does it mean that it will rain tomorrow ? nope
and so on and so on
.
I saw someone whom I supported acquitted in eight minutes
and when I queried the wisdom of bringing the case with the DPP
[email protected]
allsion saunders told me the system is meant to work like that .
( o God and on our tax payer pounds as well )
allison is paid in xs of £200k and well worth it I say !
I saw someone whom I supported acquitted in eight minutes
and when I queried the wisdom of bringing the case with the DPP
[email protected]
allsion saunders told me the system is meant to work like that .
( o God and on our tax payer pounds as well )
allison is paid in xs of £200k and well worth it I say !
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.