Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Right Of Way
I have a right of way , vehicular and pedestrian. It was signed by my husband and the owner of the land in an absolute. The land owner now wants to sell his house and wants me to give the right of way up or they will take me to court. Can they do this ? On what grounds? The absolute was signed about 40yrs ago .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Tud05. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I have been thinking about this.
obviously you want to maintain your rights and not spend unnecessary money on lawyers
I suppose the short answer is: if the right of way was transferred to you in the right way ( haha pun intended ) then it should be OK/legal/lawful/watertight
Thing is: whaddya do ?
I would wait and see and not even reply unless it is a lawyers letter
You see they have made it more difficult to sell
as they NOW have to say that they are in dispute with neighbours ( that would be you ) and they have to declare it on the 'other forms' and they are the ones that started it !
obviously you want to maintain your rights and not spend unnecessary money on lawyers
I suppose the short answer is: if the right of way was transferred to you in the right way ( haha pun intended ) then it should be OK/legal/lawful/watertight
Thing is: whaddya do ?
I would wait and see and not even reply unless it is a lawyers letter
You see they have made it more difficult to sell
as they NOW have to say that they are in dispute with neighbours ( that would be you ) and they have to declare it on the 'other forms' and they are the ones that started it !
this appears to confirm you are on firm ground ( further pun intended )
http:// www.sho osmiths .co.uk/ client- resourc es/lega l-updat es/Clai ming-a- right-o f-way-b y-presc ription -6146.a spx
http://
-- answer removed --
The most likely answers to your questions are 'no' and 'there are no grounds'. However, please confirm:
you are talking about England & wales
the right (the legal agreement) was registered with the Land Registry and thus appears as an entry on the land title of the land that you hold. There may also be restrictions or obligations on you (as the landowner), for example, an obligation to maintain the track.
Note that these agreements are normally tied to a parcel of land, and not to an individual. They are called easements.
you are talking about England & wales
the right (the legal agreement) was registered with the Land Registry and thus appears as an entry on the land title of the land that you hold. There may also be restrictions or obligations on you (as the landowner), for example, an obligation to maintain the track.
Note that these agreements are normally tied to a parcel of land, and not to an individual. They are called easements.
Dogz - I think the servient holder is saying that it isnt an easement that runs with the land
but is personal
If it was granted 40 y ago then it may well not have been registered
BUT the seller of the land with a right on it MUST know and therefore have known when he bought ( i e bought with notice )
the use of the word absolute worries me - that wouldnt be the way to do it here.
the other thing is that the other sides hould not be threatening in order to get a person to give up a lawful right....
but is personal
If it was granted 40 y ago then it may well not have been registered
BUT the seller of the land with a right on it MUST know and therefore have known when he bought ( i e bought with notice )
the use of the word absolute worries me - that wouldnt be the way to do it here.
the other thing is that the other sides hould not be threatening in order to get a person to give up a lawful right....