Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Broadband Speed - Virgin, Is This A Good Package I Am On ?
10 Answers
im in belfast. ive checked today my brodband upload speed with www.speedchecker.uk
download speed -64 mbs . then run it again its showing - 75mb/s
upload speed - 3.2 mds
www.broadbandspeedtest.co.uk
downlaod - 55 mbs
upload 3 mds
everything was typed in correctly inc postcode and my provider. i currently pay £30 per month to virgin.
is this a decent package do you think ?
download speed -64 mbs . then run it again its showing - 75mb/s
upload speed - 3.2 mds
www.broadbandspeedtest.co.uk
downlaod - 55 mbs
upload 3 mds
everything was typed in correctly inc postcode and my provider. i currently pay £30 per month to virgin.
is this a decent package do you think ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dieseldick. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.What do you pay that £30 for? Does it include telephone services? Does it include line rental? Does it include anything else, such as TV services?
There are plenty of people here in East Anglia (particularly in the more rural parts of Norfolk) who can't even get a 1Mbps download speed so, to them, over 50Mbps must be almost unimaginable!
As a guide, the Government's original basic target speed for downloads was a minimum of 2Mbps (using traditional copper cabling). I've still got a copper-cabled service but I get around 10Mbps and pay about £18 per month for it (with nothing else included). However that's a 'business' service that's incredibly reliable, with excellent support and a good contention ratio; if I went for a 'budget' package (but still using copper cables) I'd expect to pay only half that price but only get half the download speed as well.
With the advent of (so-called) super-fast broadband, the Government has now set a target of all homes having download speeds of at least 24Mbps within the next few years. (However the EU's target is slightly higher, at 30Mbps by 2020). So you're already getting well above the official target figure.
BTW: The most widely recognised speed-testing service (which is frequently used as a reference point by the technical press) is this one:
http:// www.spe edtest. net/
There are plenty of people here in East Anglia (particularly in the more rural parts of Norfolk) who can't even get a 1Mbps download speed so, to them, over 50Mbps must be almost unimaginable!
As a guide, the Government's original basic target speed for downloads was a minimum of 2Mbps (using traditional copper cabling). I've still got a copper-cabled service but I get around 10Mbps and pay about £18 per month for it (with nothing else included). However that's a 'business' service that's incredibly reliable, with excellent support and a good contention ratio; if I went for a 'budget' package (but still using copper cables) I'd expect to pay only half that price but only get half the download speed as well.
With the advent of (so-called) super-fast broadband, the Government has now set a target of all homes having download speeds of at least 24Mbps within the next few years. (However the EU's target is slightly higher, at 30Mbps by 2020). So you're already getting well above the official target figure.
BTW: The most widely recognised speed-testing service (which is frequently used as a reference point by the technical press) is this one:
http://
Bathsheba:
PC Reviver is a registry cleaner. They're generally best avoided but, if you want to try one, the only one that's regularly recommended (both here and in the technical press) is this one:
https:/ /www.pi riform. com/ccl eaner
PC Reviver is a registry cleaner. They're generally best avoided but, if you want to try one, the only one that's regularly recommended (both here and in the technical press) is this one:
https:/
^^^Most registry cleaners don't seem to make much difference for most people. Further, anything that makes changes to your computer's registry needs to be used with considerable caution (so that you don't make things far worse). CCleaner is well-designed though, so you can easily see what it's doing. (I've used it myself a few times but I wouldn't regard it as an essential program to have on a computer).
If you want to find out about all of the stuff that's most likely to slow your computer to a crawl (and what to do about it), head to your local newsagent (or supermarket) and invest £1.99 on the latest issue of Computer Active magazine. The cover article (which runs to 6 detailed pages) is full of useful advice:
http:// www.com puterac tive.co .uk/lat est-iss ue
If you want to find out about all of the stuff that's most likely to slow your computer to a crawl (and what to do about it), head to your local newsagent (or supermarket) and invest £1.99 on the latest issue of Computer Active magazine. The cover article (which runs to 6 detailed pages) is full of useful advice:
http://
Alternatives (which might only offer slightly slower speeds) here:
http:// www.mon eysavin gexpert .com/ph ones/ch eap-bro adband# ttfibre
http://