@Zacs Master
But for this :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_the_Library_of_Alexandria
we might have had *contemporary sources* with which to corroborate at least the historical sections of the bible.
However, I feel that would lead to criticism along the lines that historical authenticity, over the life and times of the tribes of Israel was used to lend weight to the embedded pieces of mystical happenings which, for all we know, mysteriously eluded all the scribes who contributed works to the Library of Alexandria, of antiquity.
Of four possible fires, the one in 391AD concurs with something naomi has posted more than once, which is that the accounts of Christ probably existed as oral history only, for about four centuries, before finally gaining enough status for a scribe (high class profession, remember) to commit it to velum. Or, failing a sympathetic professional scribe, you need a formalised church and a permanent monastery, safe from attack by, or fully approved by the Romans/Byzantines, in which adherents will train as scribes. Maybe the need to churn out copies was what drove the monastic lifestyle, who knows?
(I just checked and Council of Nicaea was 325AD.)