If you read a quote and wish to click back could the page you came from go back to the position on the previous page your reached - it happens elsewhere.
The only way I could see that not being abused is if editing is limited to less than a minute from when the post was first made.
There is a chance to read our posts before we post them but often we are in too much of a hurry to post quickly.
As you can see below it's been asked for many times, perhaps a return to the screen that would prompt you 'Are you sure you want to submit' may make some recheck what they had typed?
I have no problem going back and correcting a typo - no one sees your blushes on here.
I don't think Ed has the time to answer queries trt- in most cases it's usually obvious that the AB rules have been contravened. (I assume you aren't including your firework joke- almost anyone on her could have answered that query for you)
Abuse is not a major problem at other sites, and with a record of changes for admin, need not be an issue. Time limitation is therefore unnecessary and could be very annoying. ThereIis no reasonable reason not to allow editing: so I support the motion.
I agree with the editing. The users on this site appear to be mature and responsible and not a bunch of squabbling pre pubescent kids.
This feature is available on most websites such as facebook etc.. where moderator presence is minimal compared to to this site and I have never seen it abused.
You should give more credit to the users here which appear to be a well behaved bunch.