Which feature, if any, would you rather see implemented first on The AnswerBank?

[AB Editor]

 

This poll is closed.

Which feature, if any, would you rather see implemented first on The AnswerBank?

• Ability to upload images into questions and answers. - 43 votes
• 34%
• Ability to modify the format of text within questions an answers, including emojis. - 30 votes
• 23%
• Ability to upvote answers which will have an affect on the "Best Answer". - 29 votes
• 23%
• Other, I will say below. - 26 votes
• 20%

See final stats

Stats until: 02:14 Fri 22nd Nov 2024 (Refreshed every 5 minutes)

© AnswerBank Ltd 2000 - 2024. All Rights Reserved.

[Zacs-Master]

See. right now, it would be great for me to add a puzzled face emoji

[LadyLaLa]

So anyone you don't like you click the thumbs down, regardless of the post, and vice versa for your 'friends'? Thats not going to cause trouble is it lol!

[Tilly2]

I agree with emojis being enabled.

I'm sure those Abers with thousands of best answer would be sorry to lose them. I may be wrong.

[Tilly2]

...and a short term edit function would be so useful. See above!

[LadyLaLa]

other: allow moderators to only delete spam or blatant racist/homophobic etc posts. I've always found forums that treat members like adults usually find the members act like adults.

[naomi24]

The upvote is a bad idea for the reasons already given, emojis could work well, as could the ability to upload images more easily. JimF’s idea at 17.04 would create havoc.

I would still like to see ‘Politics’ as a main category, leaving ‘News’ free for news.

[JimF]

"Jim’s idea at 17.04 would create havoc."

How so?

[LadyLaLa]

People would deny they wrote something, and it would cause all sorts of agro.

[ToraToraTora]

only ability to modify and then only up to say 5 minutes. We can already supply pictures etc via links. Not sure what is meant by "upvote" are you talking about people on the thread voting for BA? Could be divisive.

[naomi24]

Jim, People would throw insults, upset others, and then remove all evidence -leaving the thread making no sense and themselves apparently squeaky clean. Some of the mods have done it in the past.

[Zacs-Master]

You need to read best answer, Tora. raised eyes emoji.

[Zacs-Master]

'Some of the mods have done it in the past.'

Hand grenade emoji / flash emoji

[vulcan42]

I have never understood why people need an edit function. What is wrong with reading what you've written and edit it if necessary before submitting?

[naomi24]

Nor me, Vulcan.

[ToraToraTora]

so upvote just means vote? No, terrible idea, it'd be like the Eurovision song contest.

[MissTerious]

Definitely the ability to edit or delete our own posts as Jim suggested.

I've no interest in best answers.

[Barmaid]

//We should lose the Best Answer altogether. More often than not it isn’t the BA, and is just rewarding the person who agrees with you the most'//

I agree with this in areas such as law (the only area on which I can comment with any knowledge). BA has been given to people in the past which is the answer they like best rather than the legally correct answer. New posters may view the "best answer" and the "correct answer" as the same thing and often it is not the case.

I completely get that the section should not be used instead of legal advice, however, people do love the internet. And if I had a quid for every time I had been told that "well I did some research on the internet and this is the situation....." I wouldn't be working 15 hours a day. His Lordship G Oogle has much to answer for.

I consider that "best answer" ought to be removed in such sections. (Unless of course it is mine ;) ).

[Hopkirk]

Upvoting. Is that like clicking 'like'?

[LadyLaLa]

Why is the best answer a question

[ToraToraTora]

actually editing isn't necessary either, so what if some typos get in. Make it a rule no moaning about typos.