Quizzes & Puzzles29 mins ago
Did God Use Evolution To Create Life?
289 Answers
Did God Use Evolution to Create Life? Has All Life Descended From a Common Ancestor? What does the evidence reveal? Does the evidence support the Bible’s description of events, or was Darwin correct? What have discoveries over the past 150 years revealed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by locusts. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If God exists then he/she must have a progenitor,or did God make him/her theirselves.What was there before God?I have read the book"The Commandant of Auswitchz"written by a nasty christian called Josef Kramer.Thousands of wee toddlers were murdered by the Nazis in their gas chambers.Where the hell was God then?
I am unsure why you pose these questions locusts.
You are not lkooking for answers, you have those already.
You are not looking for discussion - you rarely respond to any posts, and if you do it is with swathes cut and pasted from texts you like to feel back up your position.
So why do you post on here?
You are not lkooking for answers, you have those already.
You are not looking for discussion - you rarely respond to any posts, and if you do it is with swathes cut and pasted from texts you like to feel back up your position.
So why do you post on here?
fiveleaves; life was not necessarily created. Inert chemicals can form patterns which can engender other more complex patterns, and such patterns can start to evolve, in the sense that some of them are more viable than others and thus thrive. Once things start to thrive then evolution necessarily plays a part.
There is no evidence to support the Bible's description, since the Bible doesn't really have a description or theory, merely an assertion, one of many from ancient books including tortoises all the way down.
There is no evidence to support the Bible's description, since the Bible doesn't really have a description or theory, merely an assertion, one of many from ancient books including tortoises all the way down.
//Does the evidence support the Bible’s description of events//
No.
There doesnt appear to be any Garden of Eden anywhere (Much less one that is garded by an angel throwing flaming swords around)
(The angel might have been drowned in the flood...who knows...but so would have the enchanted garden to be fair)
No magical trees have been found (tree of life or of knowledge)
No remains of a snake with vocal chords (or legs) have been found.
No man with his side missing has been found either.
Its a conundrum!
(No dinosaures that were apparently coequal with man have been found either.
Surely, according to the Genesis account, man shared his Garden with a T-Rex or two or a Diplodocus here and there. Maybe even a
Pterodactyl...might have even offered him the occasional piece of bread.
No.
There doesnt appear to be any Garden of Eden anywhere (Much less one that is garded by an angel throwing flaming swords around)
(The angel might have been drowned in the flood...who knows...but so would have the enchanted garden to be fair)
No magical trees have been found (tree of life or of knowledge)
No remains of a snake with vocal chords (or legs) have been found.
No man with his side missing has been found either.
Its a conundrum!
(No dinosaures that were apparently coequal with man have been found either.
Surely, according to the Genesis account, man shared his Garden with a T-Rex or two or a Diplodocus here and there. Maybe even a
Pterodactyl...might have even offered him the occasional piece of bread.
The Bible was a means of conveying explanations for the unknown to the masses - pure propoganda for the most part wrapped up with some current history, moral behaviour and an ethical code.....No more, no less. It served its purpose but is now largely redundant though some use it for the still-unexplainable.
We aren't there yet as recent science is suggesting that Einstein may have been close but not spot on as to his formulations.
We aren't there yet as recent science is suggesting that Einstein may have been close but not spot on as to his formulations.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.