Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Why Are The Police Taking So Long
10 Answers
Make it quick last year Xmas Eve I was accused of assault which never happened police were called by they never came to me until 5 months later I gave my account then informed there was witnesses and he would be speaking to them “ just happened to be all family “ and told me I would be charged under common assault.
This was back in May and haven’t heard a word what’s going on why is this taking so long .
This was back in May and haven’t heard a word what’s going on why is this taking so long .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by BigRooster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The CPS site has different guidance.
"The proceedings can be commenced when both the following apply:
at any time within 2 years from the date of the offence to which the proceedings relate, and
within six months from the first date the victim made a statement or was interviewed about the incident, (section 39A(4) CJA 1988)."
That means someone could take months to report an incident and subsequently be interviewed but the six months' limit would not be backdated.
"The proceedings can be commenced when both the following apply:
at any time within 2 years from the date of the offence to which the proceedings relate, and
within six months from the first date the victim made a statement or was interviewed about the incident, (section 39A(4) CJA 1988)."
That means someone could take months to report an incident and subsequently be interviewed but the six months' limit would not be backdated.
Yes Corby. The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act (2022) makes that provision. I don't think it's appropriate here because (1) it only applies in cases of domestic violence (and apart from "just happened to be all family" there's no indication the allegation is one that would be defined as DV). But more importantly it seems the alleged victim had made a complaint and it was on that basis I replied.