News0 min ago
The Whale in the thames
30 Answers
Wasn't it sad
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dotjhawkes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think that the poor creature should have been monitored and an eye kept on it but I'm sure all the handling stressed it out to the extent that it's death was a blessed release. I feel that making such a production of the attempted rescue left the poor creature with little or no dignity during it's final hours.perhaps the intended post mortem will reveal the cause of death. Media excitement at the expense of a sick defenseless creature,--not my idea of entertainment.
It was extremely sad for the whale and I hope it didn't suffer too much distress. I guess if we can find a 'positive' in this it's that, in this often sad / violent world we live in, I found it very heartening, so that so many people wanted to help this confused and poorly creature and that there seemed to be a feeling of togetherness while people were concerned for him. Sometimes it's easy to forget that there are so many kind and caring people out there.
Interesting comment Bill. I have a respect for life, be it human or 'animal'. I can think of, and know professionally, people who some would say, are not not deserving of saving., I don't recognise a hierarchy of humans over 'animals'. Only life on the planet. I don't want to sound like a flake, but to put all human life over 'animals' is not fair or well appraised. Think of the likes of Hiter, Shipman, Saddam Hussain. I would much rather put my energy into a non threatening gentle 'animal' like the whale who died a possibly distressing death. Julia.
OK, I take your point. My only point is humans should be looked after by humans in preference to imals. I know there have been bad ones but so be it. I would still prefer MY taxes to be spent on an OAP who spent 3 years in the trenches defending your right to speak, gradually eroding though it, is thanks to people who prefer to put animals first.
Re. copippin's comment - I understand your stance with regard to the 'circus' that often spontaneously springs up around such quirky events as this, but I do feel that attempts to rescue this animal were valid. As a salt water mamal, it's time in the fresh water of the Thames was always finite, and monitoring it would simply have meant watching it die slowly, wheras an attempt to liberate the whale, although unsuccessful, represented its best chance of staying alive - any illness that caused the fault in its internal navigation system that caused its loss of direction notwithstanding. The stress caused by handling may have hastened, or indeed contributed to the animal's sad demise, but I think the perception that people were 'entertained' by its suffering is somewhat wide of the mark. People were intrigued, and hopeful that this wonderful animal would be returned to its normal habitat, sadly that was not to be.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --