The path of history is solid with people who try and fail to predict the path that technology will take.
I have a book I bought in the 70's called "visions of the future" by none less than Arthur C Clarke.
He totallly fails to foresee the computer revolution despite being on the brink of it and sees a great future for hovercraft.
So I guess your vision is no more or less likely than mine or anybody elses.
But personally I think you need to remember that technologies accelerate away and then stall or progress slower. Whilst you're in an accelerating phase it looks as if it will continue forever.
That's why in the 70's everybody thought we'd be living on the moon or mars by now.
Similarly the current generation of computers will run out of road soon, the components are already getting so small that quantum errors are begining to become an issue. It remains to be seen if new types of computers such as quantum computers are truely feasible.
The growth areas seem to be nanotechnology but that's still in it's infancy and bio-technology.
You can however learn a few lessons from biotechnology. There is widespread resistance to GM crops it's a classic demonstration that technology must be acceptable as well as just viable. Nuclear energy's another one.
I think your vision will stumble here - I don't think people will want their bodies replaced with robotics. I think that biotechnology will advance the current technology of growing human organs in animals like pigs we will still be entirely human but will probably die with a small proportion of the organs we were born with