ChatterBank6 mins ago
Name and Number
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Marsh. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.You could also set it so that only traceable e-mail addresses can register. (i.e. the e-mail addresses you get from your ISP). Stopping users using hotmail, yahoo and other such addreses would stop users being able to create multiple anonymous accounts.
I have seen this done on other sites and it works well. Anonymity would still be retained between users with the benefit of AB being able to trace offenders.
Thanks Artful and jno for your comments.
To answer the point made by Salamander... is a idea only to allow ISP given email addresses, but there are people, like myself, who use independant ISP's that only provide an internet service and nothing more, so using Hotmail, Yahoo etc is necessary to have email access.
Some further thoughts. I like Lindy Loo's idea of using the joining date but AB Ed may think it a breach of privacy. And maybe the full membership number might reveal commercially sensitive information.
He could use just the last five digits, like Amazon does for credit card numbers. Even better would be an AB issued PIN, preferably including some letters to make differences easier to see. This might use up to much techie time, however.
Thank you all for your agreement.
FP, thanks so much for pointing out that I was being impersonated at the weekend. He/she is still about. As such in theory I think this user number is a good idea.
I would not however like all hotmail / yahoo addresses etc to be banned. I registered using hotmail and regularly use this as my main email. It is a habit I got into when at uni as I wanted to access my emails both at home when I used the family computer and couldn't remotely access my uni account and when at uni and not able to access the family freeserve (as it was) account. There are a lot of students who post who may be doing the same as I did. Also if you banned hotmail you'd ban me and I wouldn't like that.
I'm startled to find the fake Lillabet is still posting. I'd assumed that when 'her' existence was uncovered she'd just be deleted from the files as a matter of principle, but apparently she's allowed to go on impersonating as long as she's uncontroversial.
I don't think that's right; any member name that mimics an earlier member's should be deleted and all its posts along with it - even if they were helpful posts, in fact. If they really want to sign up and offer useful advice, they can always do so under a non-spoof name.
Meantime, real Lillabet, can't you report the fake's posts? I think the report process allows you to do so on the grounds of imposterism |(if that's a word), and only you know which is which without cutting and pasting, which seems an unduly tricky process on AB.
jno: I know. A far as I can tell s/he posted loads over the weekend. Some were reported for being offensive - and deleted. Some I think were reported for being imposters after someone kindly realised it wasn't me and proved that they were using capital I instead of small l to make the names appear identical.
I reported more yesterday as imposters and these too have disappeared. I assumed that they would be banned but this morning had to report three more answers from my imposter. Including two in my thread asking about the impersonation... Membership numbers would help