As you have seen fit to ban me outright for the twenty sixth time, 4th time this week, may I enquire why.
As you do not answer emails, I apologise for this thread, but as you see I keep coming back. Admittedly, it takes a whole 2 minutes 34 secs for me to re-register, and when it is raining outside and I am retired, it is rather laborious.
Can you please tell me why you banned me?
Was it:
8 very well argued legal answers that no doubt helped people?
2 suggestions in Food and Drink, which no doubt helped?
16 answers in Body and Soul (none of which were offensive), which no doubt helped people
2 answers in Quizzes, which were correct
Or was it because you do not like criticism of the new YOUTUBE link?
Please answer me. Surely it is you duty to inform me where I have gone wrong.
No need for others to answer please, this is solely meant for the Ed.
Wardy, are you sure it's the Ed that's banning you? Maybe it's some member who despises you and keep banning you? I'm not sure how this banning thing work because I've been banned before. But Ed was kind enough to reinstate me, after I message she/he.
Hi Wardy/Joe/Tony (or whatever name you're currently using).
I know that you've managed to annoy a few people in B&S (and in other areas which invite 'opinions' rather than 'facts') but I've got no criticism of your well thought out answers which appear in the 'factual' parts of AB which I normally post in.
However, I feel compelled to point out that you seem to be inviting the Editor to ban you again. If the Ed has decided to ban a certain person, he/she will be watching to see if the banned contributor re-registers under a different name. Your post here tells the Ed that you're barred from contributing to this site. It would hardly be surprising if you suddenly find that 'Tony_Day' is added to the list of banned members. I can understand you re-joining AB under a different name but advertising the fact seems to be inviting a ban ;-)