ChatterBank0 min ago
Fao Bigbad, Regarding The Karl Bridgewater Case
10 Answers
When we were discussing this miscarriage of justice a few weeks ago, you recommended that I read Paul Foots book on the subject. I finished the book last night.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I found the book to be a marvellous work of investigative journalism. He successfully proved that the Bridgewater Four did not and could not murder Karl. Without his efforts and that of Ann Whelan, William Hickeys mother, the four would still be languishing in prison.
Foot successfully makes a case against the Police, for their part in the prosecution. Their fabrication of evidence played a major part in the wrongful conviction.
As far as Bert Spencer is concerned, he also makes a case for a further investigation to be made by the Police. What a pity that Foot didn't live long enough to see the latest events against the distinctly creepy Spencer !
Foot successfully makes a case against the Police, for their part in the prosecution. Their fabrication of evidence played a major part in the wrongful conviction.
As far as Bert Spencer is concerned, he also makes a case for a further investigation to be made by the Police. What a pity that Foot didn't live long enough to see the latest events against the distinctly creepy Spencer !
Ah, those lovable rogues the Bridgewater Four. I remember reading about them some time ago. I particularly remember one phrase describing two of the gang:
"They burgled their way throughout the 1970's"
Didn't all four of them commit some sort of raid together that they readily admitted to?
Paul Foot made money writing a book about them. Otherwise, they weren't worth anybody's time or taxpayer's money in compo
"They burgled their way throughout the 1970's"
Didn't all four of them commit some sort of raid together that they readily admitted to?
Paul Foot made money writing a book about them. Otherwise, they weren't worth anybody's time or taxpayer's money in compo
-- answer removed --
this was at a time that confessions and convictions due only to confession were riding high in the public imagination
the landscape is different
( and was never like that in Scots criminal law where a confession alone could not form the basis of a conviction )
[ and I was completely taken in at the time
I believed all the confessions
bit of a shock to be disabused
as Lord Denning said - "but if they let one out they will have to let them all out !"
whereas the Lord Chief Justice Peter Taylor commented when asked if he regretted imprisoning innocent men for 15-20 y - "it is not my fault if the police choose to lie to me" ]
the landscape is different
( and was never like that in Scots criminal law where a confession alone could not form the basis of a conviction )
[ and I was completely taken in at the time
I believed all the confessions
bit of a shock to be disabused
as Lord Denning said - "but if they let one out they will have to let them all out !"
whereas the Lord Chief Justice Peter Taylor commented when asked if he regretted imprisoning innocent men for 15-20 y - "it is not my fault if the police choose to lie to me" ]
-- answer removed --
I suggest that all you deniers read the book, and then argue from a point of better knowledge and understanding, rather than " I have made my mind up, now don't confuse with any facts"
I repeat that without the fraud committed by the Police, there was no evidence that the Bridgewater Four committed murder.
And Bert Spencer is far from innocent in this case.
I repeat that without the fraud committed by the Police, there was no evidence that the Bridgewater Four committed murder.
And Bert Spencer is far from innocent in this case.
Glad you found the book interesting, Mikey.
For me, it’s the little things that when you put them together, turn into big things:
The DPP not allowing the defence to see certain witness statements - ‘In the interests of justice.’
Witness statements from people who were at the garage on the afternoon of the murder (the Hickey cousins alibi) being kept from the defence.
The police not checking with the staff at the greengrocers shop (re: the flowers) until 10 months later.
Witness Helen Johnston contradicting herself and (at a later date) admitting she had lied.
The strategically placed cardboard message, that was found bone dry in the pouring rain!
I don’t know if Brian & Janet Bridgewater (Carl’s parents) are still alive, but he had siblings, so maybe they will see justice for their brother.
For me, it’s the little things that when you put them together, turn into big things:
The DPP not allowing the defence to see certain witness statements - ‘In the interests of justice.’
Witness statements from people who were at the garage on the afternoon of the murder (the Hickey cousins alibi) being kept from the defence.
The police not checking with the staff at the greengrocers shop (re: the flowers) until 10 months later.
Witness Helen Johnston contradicting herself and (at a later date) admitting she had lied.
The strategically placed cardboard message, that was found bone dry in the pouring rain!
I don’t know if Brian & Janet Bridgewater (Carl’s parents) are still alive, but he had siblings, so maybe they will see justice for their brother.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.