Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Do you consider art ....
41 Answers
.....to be a subjective thing ?
What is the definition of art ?
- Do you consider the following to be art ?
-an unmade bed
- a pile of sand in the middle of a room .
Would it be considered art if joe bloggs deposited a pile of sand in the middle of a room ? .
Who decides what is art ?
What is the definition of art ?
- Do you consider the following to be art ?
-an unmade bed
- a pile of sand in the middle of a room .
Would it be considered art if joe bloggs deposited a pile of sand in the middle of a room ? .
Who decides what is art ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by BertiWooster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.1 yes, in that I disagree with what a lot arty people call art
2 representation of real life and of an individual's imagination (which means that it is not so far from science)
3 no
3 no
4 no
5 usually those people who set themselves up as art critics or the artist's groupies
I've always been very very pro-science vs. art, but maybe I'm softening as I get older.
2 representation of real life and of an individual's imagination (which means that it is not so far from science)
3 no
3 no
4 no
5 usually those people who set themselves up as art critics or the artist's groupies
I've always been very very pro-science vs. art, but maybe I'm softening as I get older.
The unmade bed artists revealed a large pink neon sign in her home town of Margate (near here) in the summer. Not what I call art. But - art and beauty are in the eye of the beholder, each to their own. That pile of ceramic seeds laid all over the floor of the Tate looked like - odd - to me. We have people round here who are given funding for Public Art - it's usually in places nobody ever goes and certainly most people here would rather it were spent on something more useful.
At its best, art should stir one's emotions and/or imagination.
Like you, Berti (apparently), I can find it difficult to relate to some of the works which compete for the Turner Prize each year but there are some current artists (in the widest sense) whose work I absolutely adore. They include the photographer Martin Parr, the architects working for de Rijke Marsh Morgan and just about anyone finding 21st century applications for Art Deco.
I'm hoping that young Kieron Williamson will soon gain the confidence to produce some really original works. He painted these pictures last year (when he was still 7 years old). If he can go on to develop a truly individual style, the art world could soon be seeing something really mind-blowing!
http://www.kieronwill...ge/en-GB/Default.aspx
Chris
Like you, Berti (apparently), I can find it difficult to relate to some of the works which compete for the Turner Prize each year but there are some current artists (in the widest sense) whose work I absolutely adore. They include the photographer Martin Parr, the architects working for de Rijke Marsh Morgan and just about anyone finding 21st century applications for Art Deco.
I'm hoping that young Kieron Williamson will soon gain the confidence to produce some really original works. He painted these pictures last year (when he was still 7 years old). If he can go on to develop a truly individual style, the art world could soon be seeing something really mind-blowing!
http://www.kieronwill...ge/en-GB/Default.aspx
Chris
Well, if an unmade bed is considered to be art, then I didn't realise what great artistic talents I've been hiding all these years !
The last art museum I visited was the modern art museum in Salzburg. I struggled to understand any of it, especially a series of pornographic photographs being dusted by a butler named Peter! An entire top floor exhibition hall contained about 40 large canvases, each covered with spattered paint!
I like convenional art such as those works in the Louvre or National Gallery. I think if paintings represent long-gone scenes or portraits they can have a particular fascination and appeal.
The last art museum I visited was the modern art museum in Salzburg. I struggled to understand any of it, especially a series of pornographic photographs being dusted by a butler named Peter! An entire top floor exhibition hall contained about 40 large canvases, each covered with spattered paint!
I like convenional art such as those works in the Louvre or National Gallery. I think if paintings represent long-gone scenes or portraits they can have a particular fascination and appeal.
Well, since we've got a Scandinavian participant on this thread, I'll point out that something which is mainly functional can also be stunning 'art':
http://commons.wikime...3%96resund_bridge.JPG
Chris
http://commons.wikime...3%96resund_bridge.JPG
Chris
Perhaps, Jno, the argument is that Rembrandt and Rodin would have been displaying their exceptional talents in order to create a REPRESENTATION of a bed, rather than making the bed itself (or, more accurately, leaving it unmade!).
Tracey Emin would claim that her art lay in the 'concept', rather than the 'creation' of the work. Such an idea is valid for, say, Norman Foster (as he only has the concepts for buildings, rather than actually building them) but, to me, it appears a little more tenous in relation to Ms Emin's work.
Tracey Emin would claim that her art lay in the 'concept', rather than the 'creation' of the work. Such an idea is valid for, say, Norman Foster (as he only has the concepts for buildings, rather than actually building them) but, to me, it appears a little more tenous in relation to Ms Emin's work.
Swedeheart:
Here's the second question I ever posted on AB ;-)
http://www.theanswerb...s/Question143501.html
Here's the second question I ever posted on AB ;-)
http://www.theanswerb...s/Question143501.html
Interesting reply from sddsddean there chris, I hadn't realised the reason. / I remember when the Öresund Bridge was being built and we were talking about it at work I said nothing could convince me to travel under water, ever, and my boss laughed at me and informed me that I was already travelling under water for a short spell every time I went by subway around Old Town here in Stockholm. He found it hilarious that I had never wondered were the hell the sky went all of a sudden. He had a point!
-- answer removed --
Here is someone's definition of art
- Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging symbolic elements in a way that influences and affects the senses, emotions, and/or intellect. -
I suppose my idea of art is what I suppose would be labelled ' traditional ' art .
I find it difficult ( like you Chris ) to relate to what some , considers to be art .
I really do struggle to understand , and i'm not influenced by - nor are my senses or emotions affected by - a canvas totally painted black or a tank full of oil or a pile of bricks deposited in a heap on a floor .
- Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging symbolic elements in a way that influences and affects the senses, emotions, and/or intellect. -
I suppose my idea of art is what I suppose would be labelled ' traditional ' art .
I find it difficult ( like you Chris ) to relate to what some , considers to be art .
I really do struggle to understand , and i'm not influenced by - nor are my senses or emotions affected by - a canvas totally painted black or a tank full of oil or a pile of bricks deposited in a heap on a floor .