Could All Help With Signing My Petition
Seasonal1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by cocopops. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think it is up to the couple who want the child. Some people are ready to have a family when they are very young, others want to wait. I was 36 and it felt right at that age. I suppose that if you have your kids young you are young with them, but on the other hand, having at child at 36 has kept me thinking young. I also had a lot more patience at 36 than I had at 26 and I would have felt really tied down earlier. Physically, I felt great at 36, but I think as you get past 40 there are more risks. However, there is a lot of medical knowlege available for the older mums.
Most important that the child is wanted and loved and that the parents are ready and able to take on all the responsibility that children entail and are prepared to give them loads of time. I feel some people have children because they feel they ought to. It's a tremendous step in life, but very worthwhile.
i had my third baby at 40. I had pre-eclampsia, but did with my first at 29. I also worried myself stupid for nine months that the baby would have something wrong with it - he didn't and the relief was unbelievable!
The only trouble is, i get much more knackered than i did with my first. But of course he's worth every aching joint!
Aside from the risks that come from having older egg cells (females are born with their eggs whereas men make sperm every time it's needed), the risks are not too great if you are otherwise healthy.
If you have any health issues, e.g. diabetes, high blood pressure or bone problems then talk to you doctor before trying to conceive.
I had my second child a month shy of my 39th birthday - she's now 18 months old. I'd had my 1st at 25, and would have dearly liked another child sooner but after splitting with his dad just didn't meet the right man for quite a while !
Whilst the differences between my 2 are extreme .... they're never going to be playmates, the 13.5 yr age gap does mean that there's no rivalry and my son is very protective of his little sister. Another year or so - he's just 15 - & I hope he'll be willing to babysit too.
As for the implications, can't really think of any that are down to my age. In my head I feel every bit as good or bad a parent as I did when I was 25. I am now 40. The only things to bear in mind are the increased physical risks and necessity for prenatal tests as a result.
Personally, I have found it harder to shift the baby weight and tone up second time round .... guess that's inevitable. But I also successfully breastfed my daughter for 15 months (not exclusively I hasten to add, she did have food too from 6 months!) and I'm proud of doing that without any noticeable "droop" in that area !
I didn't really notice before but when you look around there are lots of other couples in their late 30s/early 40s with babies. I don't think it's considered as unusual as maybe it once was.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.