Would it be more useful to know who had recovered from the virus without any hospitalisation, of even without symptoms rather than who has got it now?.
Someone presenting for a routine test because they are a Key worker could test negative, and then catch it in a couple of days time. What is the point of that?
At least if you know you have had it you may be immune......or is that the problem? The scientists have no idea if you can catch the virus again once you have had it?
In an ideal world, you would think that we would all love to know who has recovered from the virus at home or has been asymptomatic either during home confinement or work. Knowing that x number of people at any given time out the population as a whole are free of the pathogen is of limited value to the government or their advisers. Furthermore, such figures could...
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.