ChatterBank0 min ago
Sod Off Musk, We Don't Want Your Influence Here In The Uk
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well it strikes me that Mr Musk is a highly competent businessman with most things he gets involved with meeting with considerable success. His success is celebrated in the US.
By contrast we have a government in the UK which believes it can do far better with other people's money than Mr Musk can do with his own and a successful businessman such as Mr Musk is told to sod off.
// most things he gets involved with meeting with considerable success. //
on the face of it, yes, but let's look a little deeper. The LVCC (Las Vegas Convention Centre Loop) is an underground transit system. Built by Mr Musk's Boring Company, its tunnels are designed to be operated using Tesla type 3 electric cars. in this fashion it could potentially move 4500 people per hour (but more realistically it moves less than 2000). if it had been built to be operated by a metro train service, it would have been capable of shifting 15000 people per hour (assuming a 6 mn train headway); indeed a metro line from Las Vegas airport to stations on The Strip would probably have been the most extensively used single line transit system in the whole of the USA. But, Mr Musk's company, having bagged the only feasible underground space in Las Vegas has effectively prevented that from ever being realised and although LVCC makes Mr Musk lots of cash, it's little more than a gimmick compared to what might have been.
//it's little more than a gimmick compared to what might have been.//
The Las Vegas loop. Do read the comments section. It becomes obvious that the people of Las Vegas got very good value for their contributions to the cost(minimal) compared say to Edingurgh's tramway or HS2.
https:/
I can't comment on a lot of the points you have all raised, but he does seem to understand efficiency. I believe that his team which designed and built the 'rocket catcher' numbered about 500 people - NASA hadn't managed it and they employ at least 5,000. A bit of that efficiency applied to the civil service - would go a long way, I believe.
// the people of Las Vegas got very good value for their contributions to the cost(minimal) compared say to Edingurgh's tramway or HS2. //
yeh but the Boring Company didn't have to do battle with the British planning process. taking the proposed Lower Thames Crossing as an example - the consultation paper for the project alone cost £300m and runs to 350,000 pages (presumably to ensure any posibility of a judicial review is headed off). And that's before a single stroke of work has actually taken place. just wait until they find colonies of rare bats, or even rarer newts, or any number of nimby complaints from the good people of Kent, that the builders will have to mitigate......
If you value somebody's bank account as an indication of competence then Putin will be scored highly. There are lots of rich people around the world, of all political persuasions. It's better to look at people's character rather than their bank balance. For example, looking at their attitude to their own partners and children ...
“he's scum. i don't want his grubby hands on this country.”
Very profound and well reasoned.
Many, many people lobby Parliament to further their business interests. There are companies which specialise in doing it on their clients’ behalf.
I should have thought that with its mania for “decarbonisation” (which borders on mental illness for some members of the government) the current administration would be more than pleased to welcome a business ally who calls for the banishing of IC vehicles. Considering that is precisely what this government aims to do in a very few years’ time anyway (regardless of the consequences) I don’t see what the problem is.
Anything that encourages this ridiculous rush to electric vehicles is a bad thing. It's a daft "solution" to a problem most civilised nations have already worked towards easing.
The expense of putying in a charging network is unjustifiable and doesn't fit the needs of the many. The cost on human terms of mining for rare battery minerals and reliance on certain nations that has them, is unacceptable; even more so given the cost and lifespan, not to mention the weight, of the batteries.
Anyone pushing that strategy and suggesting abusing the drivers of fossil fuel powered vehicles by using them even further as cash cows, are merely looking after their own wealth attracting interests and showing no moral standards as far as consideration of others is concerned.
The fellow is entitled to an expressed opinion but it behoves others to reject it and point out exactly what his real, barely hidden, motive must be.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.