ohhhh

[notfrom-oz]

i suppose it had to happen eventually ,1 of my q's got banned.....titled 'the banner cont'
im wandering if this is because i got a litle too close to who it is on suggs!!!

[pie+mash]

Spurslady's is still there nf_oz, was your one posted after?

[notfrom-oz]

i don't know ,i went onto my profile and above that q it said in scary red writing 'this question has been banned'

[noxlumos]

It's getting bloody absurd here and it's so obvious whose doing it as well, erally beginning to irritate me.

[pie+mash]

That could have been one from another day then?

It is possible that if you post a Q with something not PC in the title the techies stop it going through immediately you submit.

[notfrom-oz]

what do you mean not pc?

[pie+mash]

Crikey nox I wouldn't even begin to try and work out who is behind it all. There has been a few debates on here today, and as far as I can see most still stand.

[whiffey]

I must be completely dense, because it is not at all obvious to me who's doing all the banning. In fact, not a clue.

Once you get the red letters in your profile though it shows that the Ed has agreed.

[pie+mash]

Politically correct

[notfrom-oz]

i mearly suggested it may have something to do with a certain ms daisy,as she seems to get personal emails from the ed explaining why the banning are a happening!!


obviously im completely wrong

[notfrom-oz]

what wasn't pc about my post?

[whiffey]

oz, maybe daisy got a reply from the ed because she took the time and effort to ask ?

[pie+mash]

Let's start again nf_oz

You asked why you were banned, so I asked you when this was (you didn't say), so I suggested that maybe (if recently) it was stopped from going through by the techies immediately you submitted the Q. If there was something in the title or question that was not, shall we say, nice (having a dig at someone by name or swearing or being rude) i.e. not PC, then they will stop it forthwith. If it was allowed to go through and you either had replies or not, it could have been reported and/or Ed saw fit to ban it.

[pie+mash]

P.s. Not having seen the thread, I do not know of its contents.

[notfrom-oz]

like i said i was obviously wrong,

just wanted to get some ha ha's my bad



sorry daisy

[B00]

you could put vinny, robinia and neti on the door as bouncers too, no messing about in there then!

[notfrom-oz]

This was the thread that got banned!!


the banner cont....This question is banned.....inues!!i see that even the ab suggs are getting banned now,
spoil sports.
i was having some very useful spelling lessons in there!!

ho hum

notfrom-oz Sun 19/11/06 19:05
<< Previous Next >>


Type your answer here


SUBMIT

To subscribe to this question you need to sign in to the AnswerBank or register if you are not already a member. All you need is a valid email address to register.
1 to 5 of 5
cliffsweb
Sun 19/11/06
20:26 i'd love to know who's doing it, made me cross earlier.

muffty
Sun 19/11/06
20:37 cliffsweb, I saw your other post, but not sure which thread you were referring to.

notfrom, what was the thread about in suggs?

cliffsweb
Sun 19/11/06
20:45 cant remember either now, lol but i had a whole lot of stuff banned as my other self , so came back with my old name.

muffty
Sun 19/11/06
20:55 And your other self is.........???

notfrom-oz
Sun 19/11/06
21:01 Question Author

it was one about banning q's!!! oh the irony!! but it turned into my spelling being corrected by crete!!!bless


Post an Answer 1 to 5 of 5
Threads I'm involved in My questions Q's I gave answers to Recently viewed Q's Subscribed threads



Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Tutorial | FAQs | Site Rules

� Crystal Guides Ltd 2000-2006. All Rights Reserved