Jobs & Education1 min ago
Dodgy Aber
33 Answers
I think lifeandsold is just posting provocative statements just to wide folks up and get other Abers hot under the collar. Does anyone else feel the same?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by makemesmile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.lol at u all, wonder how many Site Rules have been broken just on this thread?
Smudge talks sense and Octavius too. LOL
China is sitting on the fence again lol
Smudge talks sense and Octavius too. LOL
China is sitting on the fence again lol
I think the term "troll" is used incorrectly, and at times, flippantly. I myself have been called a troll on numerous occassions (previously Ward-Minter, Ward~Minter and wardy with various punctuation marks and appendatures surroundimng the name).
I can truthfully say, I have never posted an opinion that I do not uphold. At times, I may play Devils Advocate, but this is always referenced in the particular thread I add.
The termage "troll" and "wind-up" came to a head a few weeks ago when I posted a question about the wrongs of hunting for pleasure. As I admitted I had hunted for food (re: survival) I was vilified for saying so.
Now, either AB is full of Guardian reading commie vegetarians or blood sport huntsmen.
Whan somebody is referred to as a troll for being supportive of wildlife and the world about us, the term really hold no weight.
The peasants who use the term liberally really need to address their own advice and at times realise their own answers to a debate are perhaps the most controversial and damnright wrong ones here.
Trolls do exist (i.e my name has been copied about 2 dozen times) but somebody who posts a valuable thread about banning smokers or killing the Welsh is not in my opinion a troll per se.
I can truthfully say, I have never posted an opinion that I do not uphold. At times, I may play Devils Advocate, but this is always referenced in the particular thread I add.
The termage "troll" and "wind-up" came to a head a few weeks ago when I posted a question about the wrongs of hunting for pleasure. As I admitted I had hunted for food (re: survival) I was vilified for saying so.
Now, either AB is full of Guardian reading commie vegetarians or blood sport huntsmen.
Whan somebody is referred to as a troll for being supportive of wildlife and the world about us, the term really hold no weight.
The peasants who use the term liberally really need to address their own advice and at times realise their own answers to a debate are perhaps the most controversial and damnright wrong ones here.
Trolls do exist (i.e my name has been copied about 2 dozen times) but somebody who posts a valuable thread about banning smokers or killing the Welsh is not in my opinion a troll per se.
B00 m�dear, one need not to know the meaning of the word to understand the parenthesis of my sentiment.
Needless to say young bean, that if you are sitting alone one evening in June supping your Hock and Seltzer, that if you find yourself belslubbering, you may not want to share or advertise the experience.
And germane to the above comment, sitting on the fence = splinter in the botty.
Needless to say young bean, that if you are sitting alone one evening in June supping your Hock and Seltzer, that if you find yourself belslubbering, you may not want to share or advertise the experience.
And germane to the above comment, sitting on the fence = splinter in the botty.