News2 mins ago
WeightWatchers ProPoints
10 Answers
Does anyone else think this diet is not half as good as the old WW Points system? I`ve followed it religiously this week and not lost an ounce. It seems really restrictive with less of a result.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by 237SJ. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I agree jared. For example my two cups of tea per morning (including a day`s milk) counts for 5 points. As they`ve only added 6 or 7 points a day (to 26 from the old 19 or 20), almost the whole difference is made up just from my tea. They`ve increased the point values of food (and in some cases doubled them) but only given a max of 26 points a day. When I started the diet I straight away thought it was too restictive but persevered when I lost 4.5 lbs in the first 2 weeks. Next week I put on 1lb, then lost .5 lb then another .5lb so I was back to where I was 2 weeks previously. I thought it was just me being slack so last week I followed the diet religiously (I even had 30 of my weekly points left by yesterday) and I haven`t lost anything at all. My personal opinion is that the diet is so restrictive that it`s slowed my metabolism.
I don't go very often as I do not like the new points system. I am a gold member as I reached my goal weight - am not there now though!! but I only have to pay when I go, so only go to get stocked up with their chocolate bars lol When they changed the points I found that I didn't lose much at all, so now I try to do it on my own.
Hi OG
They`ve gone back to calculating carbs, fibre, fat and protein (calories don`t come into it). Their idea is that some foods take more energy to digest so for example, whereas in the old days a chocolate bar was the same points as a steak, now they say you use more energy digesting the steak so it is actually better to eat that than the chocolate bar. "The science has changed" apparently! I think they just needed to dream up another diet to keep things fresh though.
They`ve gone back to calculating carbs, fibre, fat and protein (calories don`t come into it). Their idea is that some foods take more energy to digest so for example, whereas in the old days a chocolate bar was the same points as a steak, now they say you use more energy digesting the steak so it is actually better to eat that than the chocolate bar. "The science has changed" apparently! I think they just needed to dream up another diet to keep things fresh though.
I`ve heard about vintage points. I might look into that. I`m going to give myself another week though. I`ve an idea what I did wrong. I got weighed the day I got back from Hong Kong. I remembered that you`re always heavier when you`ve been flying (I think you store fluid or something). If I don`t lose next week, it`s back to the vintage points I think.