Crosswords1 min ago
How was the underground built?
20 Answers
Afternoon All,
Hope you're all well.
Now I did want to put this question in to Technology but it seemed mainly electrical in there so i thought this was the next best place so please don't shoot me.
I just wondered how the underground was built? Or more specifically, (since I have seen how they build it courtesy of living in London), how did they do the bits that go under the thames? Does it go right under the river? How did they know how deep it was? It must have been a major feat considering the time the underground was first concieved.
Cheers
China
Hope you're all well.
Now I did want to put this question in to Technology but it seemed mainly electrical in there so i thought this was the next best place so please don't shoot me.
I just wondered how the underground was built? Or more specifically, (since I have seen how they build it courtesy of living in London), how did they do the bits that go under the thames? Does it go right under the river? How did they know how deep it was? It must have been a major feat considering the time the underground was first concieved.
Cheers
China
Answers
1 to 20 of 20
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by China Doll. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
the first of the underground tunnels weren't built as tunnels as such, they closed the road dug huge trenches and then put a roof over them to make a tunnel.
Thats why if you check a proper street map with a (proper graphically correct) underground map overlaid over it you can see a lot of the early tunnels follow the roads
for the latter tunnels they had to stop doing this due to the disruption it was causing above ground with the road closures.
BTW the London sewers are probably a more impressive feat of tunnel engineering.
Thats why if you check a proper street map with a (proper graphically correct) underground map overlaid over it you can see a lot of the early tunnels follow the roads
for the latter tunnels they had to stop doing this due to the disruption it was causing above ground with the road closures.
BTW the London sewers are probably a more impressive feat of tunnel engineering.
I think dangerous rather than boring based on reading the link left by Zac Lucy.
I'm being thick though, I've read the link and looked at the pictures but I can't imagine it in my head. I don't understand how the tunelling shield works.
I'm happy to include sewers Chuck if you can explain how they're made too!
I'm being thick though, I've read the link and looked at the pictures but I can't imagine it in my head. I don't understand how the tunelling shield works.
I'm happy to include sewers Chuck if you can explain how they're made too!
The original Brunel tunnel was the world's first under a river; it's now part of the East London Line (closed till the Olympics).
The underground builders thought they were digging well under the river but they had to close the Bakerloo line for months a few years back because the water had washed away a lot of the riverbed above it and it was starting to leak, as I recall.
That's the trouble with London Underground: it was the world's first so they were never able to learn from anyone else's mistakes, they had to make them themselves. New York, for instance, realised that double tracks would be more practical for when you had to repair lines; LU have to shut down at night to allow maintenance, New York doesn't.
The shield's just a shield: you dig more tunnel in front of it, then move it along and line the new bit of tunnel behind it with bricks. It's complicated because the shield comes in sections; but the principle's the same.
The underground builders thought they were digging well under the river but they had to close the Bakerloo line for months a few years back because the water had washed away a lot of the riverbed above it and it was starting to leak, as I recall.
That's the trouble with London Underground: it was the world's first so they were never able to learn from anyone else's mistakes, they had to make them themselves. New York, for instance, realised that double tracks would be more practical for when you had to repair lines; LU have to shut down at night to allow maintenance, New York doesn't.
The shield's just a shield: you dig more tunnel in front of it, then move it along and line the new bit of tunnel behind it with bricks. It's complicated because the shield comes in sections; but the principle's the same.
the early ones where pushed forward by large screw jacks braced against the brickwork they had just built behind it, the more modern ones used hydraulic jacks.
Either way the principle is the same, the shield supports the tunnel roof so they can dig a small way out in front of it, it is then forced forwards by either of the above methods and the brick tunnel lining is built in the gap that leaves behind it, while at the same time a bit more is being dug out infront of the shield.
And so this repeats until you have a tunnel.
Either way the principle is the same, the shield supports the tunnel roof so they can dig a small way out in front of it, it is then forced forwards by either of the above methods and the brick tunnel lining is built in the gap that leaves behind it, while at the same time a bit more is being dug out infront of the shield.
And so this repeats until you have a tunnel.
Large screws mounted around the circumference of the shield (which is called a Greathead Shield, by the way, after its inventor, James Greathead) were turned against the end of the tunnel lining already in place, thus forcing the shield forwards.
The tunnels were (and indeed still are) lined with cast iron segments, not bricks. These are bolted together to form a continuous lining.
When tunnelling under water compressed air was used to pressurise the work area and prevent water ingress. This led to a number of workers getting �the Bends� (decompression sickness) similar to that experienced by divers who surface too quickly.
This form of tunnelling is only suitable in areas of soft strata (London is built predominantly on clay). This is one of the principle reasons why no deep level "tubes" were built in south-east London as most of that area is built on chalk, and the early Greathead shields could not cope with that material.
The tunnels were (and indeed still are) lined with cast iron segments, not bricks. These are bolted together to form a continuous lining.
When tunnelling under water compressed air was used to pressurise the work area and prevent water ingress. This led to a number of workers getting �the Bends� (decompression sickness) similar to that experienced by divers who surface too quickly.
This form of tunnelling is only suitable in areas of soft strata (London is built predominantly on clay). This is one of the principle reasons why no deep level "tubes" were built in south-east London as most of that area is built on chalk, and the early Greathead shields could not cope with that material.
1 to 20 of 20
