The question presupposes that you are a good student and that therefore, you already know and understand how law is made. So don't dwell on the law making process but demonstrate throughout that you know and understand how law is made by answering the prefectly straigtforward and non-cryptic question that's been asked:
(IS) The law making process.....etc...
Well, what do you think? Is the law making process cumbersome and unwieldy? Does it respond quickly to changing views or technological advances?
Statutory Law (think of some examples)
Common Law (think of some examples)
Bonus marks for answering the unseen question: is it always desireable that the law should respond quickly? Perhaps the law making process is 'unwieldy' for good and justifiable reason. Can you think of any?
Retrospective laws.
Write your answer not by explaining that statutory law starts off with an MP presenting a bill and then going through all the reading and committee stages etc, yadda, yadda, yadda. Rather, you would want to take an example of a recent statute or statutes that have been enacted to respond to social or technological change. Did the law making process react quickly enough to the changing times? Do the same for common law developments.
it is easy to criticise the law making process and often, it does give the appearance that it moves far too slowly. Then again, if a law is enacted too quickly, perhaps as a knee jerk reaction to a misunderstanding public to court electoral success - is there a chance that such laws are 'bad' laws?