News2 mins ago
smacking?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by sonofthunder. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Oh God, here we go again.
- If smacking isn't hitting then WTF is it?
- If you believe physically hurting a child - your own child - is an act of love, you have some issues to work through
- I was hit when I was a child & as a result I have zero respect for my parents and anyone else that hits children
- My father stopped hitting me the day I was big enough to hit him back
- If you have a problem with someone you work with, would you smack them? If not how come it's different for a small defenceless child?
- If smacking works, how come you have to keep on doing it?
You say I have an unbalanced view yet you sit there & pretend that the reason you hurt your child is because you 'love' them? Christ knows what would happen if you didn't love them.
And of course smacking is hitting. My parents smacked me. They didn't punch me, they didn't kick me, they didn't horse-whip me, they smacked me. In other words, they hit me. Maybe you don't use fists or go kung-fu on your child but it's still violence. Smacking still hurts and is the last (& sadly, often the first) resort of weak parents.
Ask yourself two questions.
- What would you say to your child if he smacked someone at school because they couldn't get their own way?
- Is it OK for another adult to hit you if you didn't do what they wanted? If not, please explain to us the difference.
sonof, I actually think that if you are hit as a child you end up with a very balanced view indeed. I resent the inmplication that you consider those of us unlucky enough to have had abusive parents to be "unbalanced".
We have a very sharp perception thank you very much of the damage any violence from parent to child does. Smacking is not done with love, smacking is violence. If you don't agree I don't really care, but please don't get on your high horse and try to imply that the victims of parents who think violence is acceptable are somehow flawed or confused in some way and don't really undertand what you are doing because it's just a bit beyond our damaged little minds. We know, we just don't agree with what you do. I for one think someone smug enough to say smacking is "done with love" is in need of psychiatric help and will live to rue the day with their children they ever behaved as you do.
If you don't hit/smack in anger then you hit/smack coldy having given it careful consideration which is even more worrying quite frankly.Such sadism can't be "done in love" whatever you may wish to think.
Wow, some very strong and passionate opinions. I was hit as a child, never smacked across the face though, but if me and my sisters were bad and not listening we would get spanked. Personally I support it, but I also see why people are against it. But I definetly respected my parents for it. My sisters and I never would talk back, or act inappropriatly. In return we were always brought everywere with my parents because they never had to worry about us behaiving poorly.
I see most children now-a-days, swear and talk back to their parents. It's quite rediculous. That new TV show, "Super Nanny". I think she has some fantastic ideas no how to handle your children when they are acting up (without hitting). I watch it often, but I must say, sometimes those kids just need a whack on the a**. I definetly think smacking is hitting no matter how you look at it.
sonofthunder, just carry on as you are, do what you think is right at the time and don't worry about it.
"Small defenceless" children do not have equal rights with their parents. The reasons for this are blatantly obvious. The parent has all the responsibility and the child has none.
Anyone trying to draw a parallel between the parent/child relationship and (as stated above) colleague to colleague or even child to child are so far off the mark, they are the ones who need educating.
Surely all children are as individual as their parents. This being said, then a single smacking is good /bad philosophy cannot be applied to all children, as it is down to the individual�s circumstances.
By �smack� I mean using an open-hand where the SOUND of the smack is the main deterrent. I DO NOT mean punching and kicking, using belts, shoes or canes or any other means of inflicting excruciating pain.
To those who cannot differentiate between a smack and a punch may I suggest that you visit your local boxing /martial arts centre to become better educated.
What a load of rubbish. - just as ludicous as saying "IF saying NO works, how come you have to keep on doing it?"
May as well support anarchy. Just let your kids do what they want whenever they want.
After all, once you have said NO once, there is little point in saying it again is there?
I was smacked as a child and concur with Gef .
Shockingly the majority of adult males aged over 40 were SMACKED by their parents / teachers / policemen and funnily enough the vast majority of these people are balanced, well adjusted human beings who do not go around attacking other people.
To compare the way a child is treated to the way an adult is treated is quite frightening and if people can't differentiate, I suggest that they start campaigning to let children drive / vote / smoke etc.
STOP smacking your son he's a person and you cannot abuse him this way.
As an adult of instance would you like it if someone were to slap you on the leg or hand and cause you pain when you made a mistake or did something wrong.
I have 5 children and have never smacked them not even a tap, it's very wrong.