fao China Doll

[Sqad]

//Why not try asking other ABers? He's not the only medically qualified person, (and I don't mean me). There's a couple of others.//

Re, your answer as above on the Body and Soul section.

We have been down this road over a year ago, instigated by 4get and a couple of her mates.

There is nothing that I can do to stop ABers using fao sqad, just as BOO, sara, et al can't stop ABers using fao BOO, fao sara and so on. It really matters little, in my opinion and experience over the years ANYBODY jumps on the bandwagon.

You mention two other medically qualified contributors, who and where are they? I would be delighted for them to share the answers...........how do you know they are medically qualified, how do you know I am medically qualified, or Barmaid a Barrister, sara a solicitor?..only by the quality and authenticity of the answers.

However, I will support your plea and ask ABers.....DO NOT USE "FAO SQAD" as a title question.

[ummmm]

Is Sara a solicitor? I didn't know that....

Morning Sqad :-) xx

[Sqad]

ummmm...morning, nice to have you back.

sara...yes, I understand that she is, although I stand to be corrected.

[DrFilth]

if she is a scally she is an unlucky one lol

[ummmm]

My dongle is really slow :-(

I was going to try and hold out until Marty had sorted a new provider....but I couldn't. I'm weak.

[Sqad]

ummmm...the thought of you would "quicken my dongle" LOL

[ummmm]

pmsl.... :-)

Who's been giving you grief Sqad??

[Sqad]

ummm...nobody really ......I love it......;-)

[ummmm]

I know you do :-)

(I do too)

[seekeerz]

cut it out, you two - you're steaming up the windows !! onya, Sqad, I know who I'd ask [ ps, I'm jealous !!]

[ummmm]

lol seekeerz.....

[cazzz1975]

whoa!! I dont think china was having a dig at you sqad, sherrardk wanted to ask a question at a time where most of us knew you would be offline. hence the "why not ask other abers"

It may make interesting headlines to think that there was more to it than it was, but china is just not like that..

http://www.theanswerb...l/Question859557.html

[Sqad]

cazz.....mmmmm! then why mention it at all?

As you well know a fao threads brings all the "world and their uncles" like flies to the proverbial cow pat".............one cannot have a personal thread on AB.

So why mention it at all?

[ChuckFickens]

"So why mention it at all? "

Yes my thought exactly when I saw this thread!

[Sqad]

chuck

//However, I will support your plea and ask ABers.....DO NOT USE "FAO SQAD" as a title question.
Sqad (Sat 08:20 06/Feb/10)//

That is why....to support her plea,

[cazzz1975]

because she like a lot of regulars was aware that you were offline, in that instance it could be that sherrards question could be answered by someone else who was online last night rather than having to wait until the next day to talk to you.

she did not once moan about FAOs either

[Sqad]

cazz...I have used fao as a simplistic way of asking for a particular person and the user named me on the question i.e another way of saying" fao" and this is what CD objected to.

You seem to have forgotten the acrimonious thread on this very same topic many months ago.

I felt that "mentioning "

[Sqad]

mentioning it now might put the hat on it for good.

[cazzz1975]

well that wasnt the way I enterpreted china's comment.

there were several FAOs used in questions around the site yesterday and no one started an argument about the use of an FAO in any of the questions.

[Sqad]

cazz...quite

So why me..............again?