Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 43rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by kvalidir. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'll believe when I see in anything other than the Daily Mail!
Ditto
Question Author
It's all over the place as news. I just thought it was interesting. Horrible, but interesting.
I know of one case where two males DNA were found in a car. It was said at the trial that it was 5.9 trillion and 6.01 billion times likely to have come from the accused.

They were both eventually acquitted...
Bloody Eastern Europeans, coming over here and ripping our victims.....
That's sad news in a way. It will cut the ground from under the feet of all the writers with a pet theory.
Question Author
I nearly made a joke about that but thought better of it, ;-)
It's very interesting and somewhat comforting to know that he was one of the suspects - hope we hear more on this.
Question Author
What do you mean Sandy I'm halfway through the first chapter of my biography of Aaron Kosminski as we speak. It's an ill wind... ;)
Kwalo Klobinsky was saying to me...
You'll need to be quick. I'm sure there's many another writer with the same idea.
I always favoured the Duke of Clarence. And I still think that scarf looks a tad too expensive to have been the neckwear of an impoverished Polish peasant.
Question Author
I reckon there were a lot more victims than the canon 5. It'll be interesting to see if that might be true, but I'm to tired to research tonight:)
The Daily Mail states it is proven 'beyond reasonable doubt'. No it isn't and nor will we ever know since there can never be a trial to test all the facts.
Interesting that in January this article was published
http://m.psychologytoday.com/blog/wicked-deeds/201401/jack-the-ripper-identified
Are you suggesting a murderous band of cutthroats, including among them the highest and the lowest in the land, went out on killing sprees? Might be a story for The Mail there.
The article ( in many publications)states that ( why does everything have to be Daily Mail' related?).


I agree however - there are many situations which could lead to two people's DNA being present without guilt.
I think he was framed (by one of the other suspects). All too easy to plant DNA.
'forensic evidence supports the conclusion'

I rest my case m'lud....
could be, Canary; he was obviously an advanced geneticist too.

1 to 20 of 43rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Looks Like They've Found Out Who Jack The Ripper Really Was...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.