Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Read Village
My Daughter lives in a village called Read Lanc's, I am in search for a FOC Site that can show the direction of the pit shafts that ran near her home, we has tried the NCB Archives but as usual, there is a charge, the nearest pit that was close to her home was Hapton Valley, we believe this was the Colliery that was mining in that area, we are trying to find out if the mine shafts ran the course of George Lane, Read, I have been searching & will continue to search for the information ( Not leaving it for someone else) any help will be gratefully appreciated.tia
Answers
TW, if you suspect and archaeologic al site is in danger, all developers have to abide by PPG 15: http://www.p lanningporta l.gov.uk/pla nning/planni ngpolicyandl egislation/p reviousengli shpolicy/ppg pps/ppg15 So you need to ask around the local council to see what's being done. It doesn't necessarily halt a development, but it means proper survey,...
14:54 Tue 11th Aug 2015
Can't find anything much TWR. Only this - go to page 18.
http:// www.nmr s.org.u k/publi cations /pdf/BM 63/BM63 -5-27-b urnley. pdf
Is the NCB charge enormous? If the information is important to you perhaps its worth considering paying for it as at least the data will be accurate and your search over.
http://
Is the NCB charge enormous? If the information is important to you perhaps its worth considering paying for it as at least the data will be accurate and your search over.
No Tilly, the issue is with planning permission on a Roman Burial Ground, also there has, in the past been a pit in a village called Hapton, It was know as Hapton Valley, we understand the seams went up the area called George lane, as said the NCB want £25, for a map which I think is a rip off the Public again, the issue is planning permission for this land.
I fail to see why maps of underground coal seams would be of significance to a planning application unless it was a subsidence issue, which you say it is not. The coal seams would not a have any impact on the surface features as it looks from the diagram on Maidup's link that they were 100s of feet underground.
The other hot potato behind the query could be fracking. Although delayed for now, applications to frack will return. The biggest danger to the environment appears to occur when fracking takes place where old deep mines have been sunk (and forgotten about).
Have a look through the British geological Survey :
http:// www.bgs .ac.uk/
You could also ask the Pendle & Craven Geological Society: http:// www.kab rna.com /cpgs/w hatsnew .htm
Plus, that little museum up the Castle whee you live has a fine geology collection - they may have a useful curator who can help you.
Have a look through the British geological Survey :
http://
You could also ask the Pendle & Craven Geological Society: http://
Plus, that little museum up the Castle whee you live has a fine geology collection - they may have a useful curator who can help you.
You can get decent old OS maps free from here:
http:// nls.uk click on digital resources > maps
http://
TW, if you suspect and archaeological site is in danger, all developers have to abide by PPG 15: http:// www.pla nningpo rtal.go v.uk/pl anning/ plannin gpolicy andlegi slation /previo usengli shpolic y/ppgpp s/ppg15
So you need to ask around the local council to see what's being done. It doesn't necessarily halt a development, but it means proper survey, excavation and recording are done to preserve any evidence.
Didn't exist when the 'Gas Board' as was dug a pipeline staright through Portfoeld Camp to the west of Read.
So you need to ask around the local council to see what's being done. It doesn't necessarily halt a development, but it means proper survey, excavation and recording are done to preserve any evidence.
Didn't exist when the 'Gas Board' as was dug a pipeline staright through Portfoeld Camp to the west of Read.