Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Sunak’s £30 Billion Furlough Giveaway Abused By Uk Businesses
6 million people continued to work while on the Government’s furlough scheme. That is a massive amount of fraud, and the Government apparently splashed out tax payers money with very little (or any no) checks.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-8 654405/ SIX-MIL LION-fu rloughe d-worke rs-brok e-rules -doing- jobs-ho me-lock down-ma jor-rep ort-fin ds.html
Reckless Rishi strikes again!
https:/
Reckless Rishi strikes again!
Answers
But you see, ynnafymmi, or rather you don't see (or won't see), that Corbyloon and the likes of me are putting forward this argument: There are many thieves in this country. All of them deserve to be caught, and punished. Yet you and your ilk single out some dumb Pakistani woman who has quite wrongly done the taxpayer out of a lot of money. Why do you single her out?...
14:42 Sun 23rd Aug 2020
Once again attack, but no solution. Just what did you want him to do? The rest of the World were doing it and the left and MSM were pushing it.
IMHO we should never have had a lockdown like that. but again the left and the MSM pushed it.
Where Rishi has gone wrong is extending it.
This does appear to be a big problem and HMRC must look into it to see how much foundation there is in the claim.
IMHO we should never have had a lockdown like that. but again the left and the MSM pushed it.
Where Rishi has gone wrong is extending it.
This does appear to be a big problem and HMRC must look into it to see how much foundation there is in the claim.
dannyk13
Don’t check on the employees, check on the businesses that are getting the money. If work is being done, it would be simple to check the economic activity of the business.
I know several people who worked during furlough, going to their work premises in a couple of instances. The employees made nothing out of this, but the employers did.
Don’t check on the employees, check on the businesses that are getting the money. If work is being done, it would be simple to check the economic activity of the business.
I know several people who worked during furlough, going to their work premises in a couple of instances. The employees made nothing out of this, but the employers did.
Ymb,
I have not grassed anyone up because I don’t want my friends to lose their jobs.
A scheme that has no checks but relies on whistleblowers to police it, is fatally flawed.
I will not shut up because highlighting the incompetence of your Chancellor is embarrassing to you. £20billion is a lot of money stolen to turn a blind eye to.
I have not grassed anyone up because I don’t want my friends to lose their jobs.
A scheme that has no checks but relies on whistleblowers to police it, is fatally flawed.
I will not shut up because highlighting the incompetence of your Chancellor is embarrassing to you. £20billion is a lot of money stolen to turn a blind eye to.
Gromit, you do realise these are not hard figures but derived from a report from a University study of 9,000 people? It also doesnt seem to break it down too much to understand the definition of 'work' for instance logging in to read emails could constitute work.
This Daily Mail piece (interesting you use the 'Daily Wail' as many of you call it) also stated HMRC is looking at 8000 tip offs. I doubt that nice round figure is accurate either but shows it is being investigated.
What more do you want? What would you have done?
This Daily Mail piece (interesting you use the 'Daily Wail' as many of you call it) also stated HMRC is looking at 8000 tip offs. I doubt that nice round figure is accurate either but shows it is being investigated.
What more do you want? What would you have done?
GROMIT, there are checks, "HMRC said about 3,000 letters were being sent each week to companies suspected of over-claiming and ‘sophisticated computer software’ was scanning claims and financial data to find evidence of fraud. Employers have 90 days to correct errors in their claims.
Firms that breached the rules will have to repay the money plus the same amount again as a fine."
Firms that breached the rules will have to repay the money plus the same amount again as a fine."
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.