ChatterBank2 mins ago
Debt Rule To Change To Fund Major Projects
//At the moment, the amount of money the government can borrow for investment is restrained by the amount of debt it has.
There is a self-imposed rule that debt – the total amount the government owes – must fall in five years’ time.
But the Treasury has effectively confirmed it will loosen the target in order to borrow billions more to invest in a range of major projects.//
https:/
The government will borrow billions more. What could possibly go wrong?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.how will we pay it off with such low productivity? we have crappy public transport, rubbish wifi and fake 5g. schools in parts of the country are literally falling apart because of poor maintenance. you can't spend your way to growth but you can't cut your way to it either... britain's infrastructure needs improving.
none of those things will make the uk's economy more productive
https:/
Isnt it now £40 Bn?
Borrowing more is the road to disaster. We need to cut our cloth on things we dont really need at the moment, much as higlighted by TTT above.
We do need to invest in infrastructure but it needs to be done without borrowing which will end up very inflationary. Also of course infrastructure does not generate growth in the short term.
Borrowing to invest in well considered investment with readonable expectations of getting cleared within the expected time, isn't necessarily wrong. Doing so when already in debt is less comfortable. Borrowing just to try to be popular and spending it on things that don't have longer term benefits, is a bad idea. We'll just have to see where it all goes.
Infrastructure is it? Here's a part that I have a particular interest in, driving it twice a week as I do.
https:/
When the first set of signs went up, years ago now, it advertised that the whole road would be dualled by 2025. Those signs went the way of all things when the European money vanished and the Nats, for it was they, installed average speed cameras over the entire road from Dunblane (already dualled) to about 10 miles from Inverness and at the same time raised the speed limit for HGVs to 50mph as a 'trial'.
Fast forward to today and next to nothing has been built, the HGV trial speed limit has been re-signed as the HGV speed limit because it's very cheap to do and now the wee men in their bunnets stare through their steering wheels gripped tight as to be unshakable and hold everybody up on the two way sections before disappearing to the horizon on the dualled parts because they miss the HGV part, the limit for cars being 60mph.
Anyway, you'll see from the link just how embarrassingly far back the project has been push and it stands as a monument to over-promoted town councillors in a pretend parliament endeavouring to organise a p-up in a brewery.
Infrastructure? Sub-contract it to China and be done with it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.