Road rules1 min ago
Bathtub vs Shower
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by md0u812a. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If the house is worth, say, �150K , with a bath, it's probably still worth around �150K with only a shower. The problem is that you might sell it within a couple of months with a bath, whereas you might have to wait six months to find a buyer (at the same price) with just a shower. This is fine if you're not in a hurry to sell but, if you need a quick sale, you might find it necessary to drop the price by, say, �15K to find a buyer prepared to overlook the absence of a bath.
Chris
There seems to be a strange fetish about wallowing in mucky bath water. I haven't had a bath in over forty years and removed the bath in our house to instal a large corner shower. If and when we sell, it is relatively cheap to reinstal(?) a bath although, as most people seem to rip out the previous owners efforts anyway, I do not imagine it to be a major difficulty.
If we travel, it is no problem to book rooms with shower rather than bath. In the meantime at home we have a lovely spacious room uncluttered by a Victorian piece of furniture (bath). I do understand they are useful for keeping coal in though.
Personally it wouldn't put me off. As somebody has already said previously people often buy houses then install their own bathroom suites. I did that last year, and installed a bath and shower, I really wish now I hadn't bothered with the bath. (used it half a dozen times at the most)
I think also it depends on your property, if it is a family home then yes possibly you should have a bath, however if like me you live in a small 1 bedroom flat which you would never class as a family home then I think you could maybe get away with a wet room - just my thoughts, go with what you think and want....