ChatterBank6 mins ago
Krakatoa Strikes Again
13 Answers
Although not on the same scale as the Boxing Day Tsunami of 2004 and the Krakatoa eruption of 1883, this is awful and I can see more fatalities to come. So far 168 confirmed dead and many missing :((
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/w orld-as ia-4666 3158
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tiggerblue10. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.v_e at 10.23
Factually incorrect.
You've been taken in by proven climate-change liar Christopher Monckton
https:/ /scienc eblogs. com/del toid/20 06/11/2 3/monck ton-cla ims-vol canoes- emit
Mediabias: These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.
He has no training in science and just asserts things that suit his agenda, with zero evidence.
https:/ /www.sk eptical science .com/Mo nckton_ Myths_a rg.htm
Studies (referenced above) show that while CFCs are present in volcanic gas emissions, the levels are no higher than the atmospheric background, so there is no additional emission by volcanic activity.
And as soon as you think about it, there is no way that CFCs could be produced by natural processes, since they are produced only in chemical plants.
Monckton saw some scientific papers showing that volcanic emissions of HCl (hydrogen chloride, which becomes hydrochloric acid when dissolved in water) and misinterpreted the HCl formula as a CFC.
Just plain wrong.
Misinformation.
Demonstrating real lack of understanding of the issues
Deliberately seeking to devalue factual discussion
Like much of the crap discussed by ill-informed, gullible, politically-motivated contributors to these threads.
Worse, spreading these lies rather than offering sympathy for the dead and injured.
And Merry Christmas to all of you.
Factually incorrect.
You've been taken in by proven climate-change liar Christopher Monckton
https:/
Mediabias: These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.
He has no training in science and just asserts things that suit his agenda, with zero evidence.
https:/
Studies (referenced above) show that while CFCs are present in volcanic gas emissions, the levels are no higher than the atmospheric background, so there is no additional emission by volcanic activity.
And as soon as you think about it, there is no way that CFCs could be produced by natural processes, since they are produced only in chemical plants.
Monckton saw some scientific papers showing that volcanic emissions of HCl (hydrogen chloride, which becomes hydrochloric acid when dissolved in water) and misinterpreted the HCl formula as a CFC.
Just plain wrong.
Misinformation.
Demonstrating real lack of understanding of the issues
Deliberately seeking to devalue factual discussion
Like much of the crap discussed by ill-informed, gullible, politically-motivated contributors to these threads.
Worse, spreading these lies rather than offering sympathy for the dead and injured.
And Merry Christmas to all of you.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.