ChatterBank3 mins ago
If The Claim Against Hmp Swaleside And The Prison Service Cost The Ministry Of Justice £73,806, How Much Would It Have Cost The Prisoner If He Had Lost His Case?
15 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-49 48362/I nmates- writes- guide-s uing-pr ison-se rvice.h tml
Absolutely nothing I suspect, seems they are on a win, win situation no matter what.
Absolutely nothing I suspect, seems they are on a win, win situation no matter what.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.And even this savage jumps on the band wagon.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-49 50418/L ee-Rigb y-kille r-s-25- 000-law suit-lo sing-tw o-teeth .html
http://
Tora,
It wasn't messages from his penpal that were opened, it was legal correspondence which is priviledge. The security defence put up as an excuse by the prisons is spurious and was rightly ignored.
prison law legal aid cannot be used to bring judicial review challenges against the state.
Thereis an helpful guide in this Daily Mail link
// Under Prison Rule 39, an inmate's correspondence with courts and their legal adviser can only be opened, stopped or read in specific circumstances, such as where officials suspect letters contain illicit items.
"Prison Service policy is clear that even accidental breaches of Rule 39 open the possibility of legal challenge." //
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/w ires/pa /articl e-32530 67/Pris on-staf f-breac hed-rul es-open ing-inm ates-le gal-let ters.ht ml
It wasn't messages from his penpal that were opened, it was legal correspondence which is priviledge. The security defence put up as an excuse by the prisons is spurious and was rightly ignored.
prison law legal aid cannot be used to bring judicial review challenges against the state.
Thereis an helpful guide in this Daily Mail link
// Under Prison Rule 39, an inmate's correspondence with courts and their legal adviser can only be opened, stopped or read in specific circumstances, such as where officials suspect letters contain illicit items.
"Prison Service policy is clear that even accidental breaches of Rule 39 open the possibility of legal challenge." //
http://
// I always thought mail between legal and prisoner was sacrosanct but mail between outside world and prisoner was looked at. //
good post alba so it wont get to BA hur hur hur
privileged - is the word people are looking for
and they are
shipman had to send letters to his wife thro his lawyer
because the staff were photocopying them and selling them to the papers
and the gov commented ' I am not responsible for what my staff do'
well thats OK then
who would have paid if the lag had lost - trumpets dear sweet old AOG triumphantly
criminal cases ( which erm this wasnt) are always liddle guy against big guy-[ here the inexhaustible resources of the CPS ( a million spent on Heath who cant go to prison as he id dead) against the defendant who had to pay for his own defence)
defence costs are truly dead money... you never get them back
good post alba so it wont get to BA hur hur hur
privileged - is the word people are looking for
and they are
shipman had to send letters to his wife thro his lawyer
because the staff were photocopying them and selling them to the papers
and the gov commented ' I am not responsible for what my staff do'
well thats OK then
who would have paid if the lag had lost - trumpets dear sweet old AOG triumphantly
criminal cases ( which erm this wasnt) are always liddle guy against big guy-[ here the inexhaustible resources of the CPS ( a million spent on Heath who cant go to prison as he id dead) against the defendant who had to pay for his own defence)
defence costs are truly dead money... you never get them back
// https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Legal _profes sional_ privile ge_in_E ngland_ and_Wal es//
here
rules are different for terrorism of course ( over ridden by statute as wiki coyly says )
here
rules are different for terrorism of course ( over ridden by statute as wiki coyly says )
the case is reported here
URL: http:// www.bai lii.org /ew/cas es/EWHC /Admin/ 2017/70 4.html
bit high brow for AB - there will be a deluge of one liners like
wot dat den / Bruton is a place or a skool innit - wot dis den ? etc etc
URL: http://
bit high brow for AB - there will be a deluge of one liners like
wot dat den / Bruton is a place or a skool innit - wot dis den ? etc etc
one section says
Moreover the response of HMP Swaleside to the PPO's report was frankly lamentable and evidences, over a prolonged period of time, a lack of interest in recognising evident shortcomings in its systems still less in implementing effective change.
PPO is prisoners' parliamentary ombudsman
one of the defendants turned up to court and said
" if it doesnt have 'rule 39' on it - we can open and read it" another gave evidence that some of Brutons lawyers letters had turned up in someone elses cell because it had been mis-delivered. oops ! yes that is waht the governor said but didnt do diddly squat else about it
Moreover the response of HMP Swaleside to the PPO's report was frankly lamentable and evidences, over a prolonged period of time, a lack of interest in recognising evident shortcomings in its systems still less in implementing effective change.
PPO is prisoners' parliamentary ombudsman
one of the defendants turned up to court and said
" if it doesnt have 'rule 39' on it - we can open and read it" another gave evidence that some of Brutons lawyers letters had turned up in someone elses cell because it had been mis-delivered. oops ! yes that is waht the governor said but didnt do diddly squat else about it
an eye is £106 000
the Dept of Justice ( excuse me whilst I snigger )
disputes Bruton's amount which I think is the sum of the moolah and the lawyers' costs
and yes he wouldnt get very much
in fact read the case
the Dept of Justice ( hur hur hur) actually plead- none because there is no loss
Bruton has quite a high hurdle to jump as
as all the staff need to do: is open the letter, fail to record it and then say as they hand it to him - "we didnt open this - you did"
[in fact the judge thinks they have done this in some cases]
there is also the little matter of the lawyers letter that ends up in someone elses cell.
Bruton is assisted by a PO saying under oaf: "yeah if it doesnt have Rule 39 on it we can open it." ( all three prisons) - Bruton cannot show there is intention
the Dept of Justice ( excuse me whilst I snigger )
disputes Bruton's amount which I think is the sum of the moolah and the lawyers' costs
and yes he wouldnt get very much
in fact read the case
the Dept of Justice ( hur hur hur) actually plead- none because there is no loss
Bruton has quite a high hurdle to jump as
as all the staff need to do: is open the letter, fail to record it and then say as they hand it to him - "we didnt open this - you did"
[in fact the judge thinks they have done this in some cases]
there is also the little matter of the lawyers letter that ends up in someone elses cell.
Bruton is assisted by a PO saying under oaf: "yeah if it doesnt have Rule 39 on it we can open it." ( all three prisons) - Bruton cannot show there is intention
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.