Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Safeguarding
44 Answers
For the first time ever the year 7 kids from the village are going to have to catch the public bus to secondary school. They will then be dropped off and have to walk to the school on the outskirts of another village (it's about nine miles away). At the end of the day they will walk back to the bus stop and catch the bus home. In winter they will obviously be doing this when it is still quite dark/getting dark. These kids are not street smart in any way shape or form. A lot of parents, me included, are not happy about them doing this. We have a solution in the form of a chaperone (a kid who will be in year 11, will be a prefect and knows most of the kids involved). This chaperone will need to have his bus fare paid for (as he has a free seat on the school bus) and I don't think it's fair to ask the parents to fund this as they are already having to pay for the year 7's to get to school (this used to be free). Does anyone think I can use the 'safeguarding' card? The head of the secondary school has previously stated that he wil help, blah, blah, blah but now he is trying to wheedle out of it (it will be £140 a term). Sorry it's so long winded.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sherrardk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.'This chaperone will need to have his bus fare paid for (as he has a free seat on the school bus) and I don't think it's fair to ask the parents to fund this as they are already having to pay for the year 7's to get to school (this used to be free). '
Why could you not have just said 'my Son has offered to chaperone these children and we don't see why we should pay?'
Your son is not deemed legally responsible at 11 even though he probably is very sensible. Also an older child in charge of younger siblings often causes problems in itself.
Maybe you can now tell us why year seven are not allowed on a free school bus if they live in the same village as year 11's?
Why could you not have just said 'my Son has offered to chaperone these children and we don't see why we should pay?'
Your son is not deemed legally responsible at 11 even though he probably is very sensible. Also an older child in charge of younger siblings often causes problems in itself.
Maybe you can now tell us why year seven are not allowed on a free school bus if they live in the same village as year 11's?
...aaaand, breathe.
I think Sherrard was exploring the principles involved without personalising the situation?
Year 11 is a busy and pressured time, and a student may want / need to remain after school for extra lessons as exams hail into view. In addition, their exams can start as early as April, and they may finish attending school in May or whenever their exams end ('study leave')
So as well as the responsibility being a bit much, I would see the commitment as being potentially detrimental to the older kid.
I think Sherrard was exploring the principles involved without personalising the situation?
Year 11 is a busy and pressured time, and a student may want / need to remain after school for extra lessons as exams hail into view. In addition, their exams can start as early as April, and they may finish attending school in May or whenever their exams end ('study leave')
So as well as the responsibility being a bit much, I would see the commitment as being potentially detrimental to the older kid.
I've discussed this at length with my eldest. He knows all the pitfalls and has suggested a 'deputy' for the days when he can't do it. The year 7's may be ok on their own after a couple of weeks, I'm not suggesting that this is for the whole year. Personally, I would prefer a different solution which doesn't involve boy #1 at all but as usual everyone is not happy with the situation and no one is doing anything about it. Sit around moaning isn't going to sort it out.
I would very carefully explore the legalities of your solution. You would need all parents to sign some sort of disclaimer to,say that they are happy for your son to be responsible for them and even then, should something happen, you / he may not be exempt from legal action. I know I'm being pessimistic but it's better to consider such eventualities now rather than when you're stood in front of a man with a curly,wig.