ChatterBank38 mins ago
oh dear
46 Answers
My friend (who got pretty average grades at GCSE) has just told me how much revision he's done for his january exams . . .
''wow! 4 business, i started when we came back from the holidays...
i did spanish all through the holidays though :/
now ive done my business, im starting my ICT 4 next friday
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike''
and this was my reply;
'' From my maths today, I can tell you that, that won't be enough, and it may be too late. I start revising the night after a lesson, by going over things as I put them in my folder, aswell as doing all the homework, then doing exrtra revision of things we did in september and october to refresh my memory, and I still couldn't answer all the questions! 8 minutes ago ·''
He hasn't replied yet. What do you think his chances of passing are? He said he does about 4 hours per subject per week (including homework, no CW yet) during term time.
''wow! 4 business, i started when we came back from the holidays...
i did spanish all through the holidays though :/
now ive done my business, im starting my ICT 4 next friday
about an hour ago · LikeUnlike''
and this was my reply;
'' From my maths today, I can tell you that, that won't be enough, and it may be too late. I start revising the night after a lesson, by going over things as I put them in my folder, aswell as doing all the homework, then doing exrtra revision of things we did in september and october to refresh my memory, and I still couldn't answer all the questions! 8 minutes ago ·''
He hasn't replied yet. What do you think his chances of passing are? He said he does about 4 hours per subject per week (including homework, no CW yet) during term time.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mollykins. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Here's how much revision I've done in my life:
O-levels (= GCSE grades A to C), all 10 of them: Absolutely none.
A-levels, 3 of them: Not one minute
Teaching Certificate:
Education Theory: None
Mathematics: None
Physics: 40 minutes!!!
Degree: None whatsoever
Fell Walking Leader's Certificate: None
First Aid Qualifications (to instructor level): None
Driving test: None
Football referee's exam: Absolutely none.
British Chess Federation Regional Coach's Award: None
Journalism qualification: Not a sausage
When I was teaching I'd always feel like a fraud when I urged most of my pupils to revise, but at least I was honest with the most able students. I simply told them that revision is largely a waste of time. If you didn't fully understand something first time around there's not much chance that it will make sense later on!
Chris
(PS: Most people I know who've obtained First Class Honours degrees attended well under half of their lectures and hardly ever opened a book during their university days!)
O-levels (= GCSE grades A to C), all 10 of them: Absolutely none.
A-levels, 3 of them: Not one minute
Teaching Certificate:
Education Theory: None
Mathematics: None
Physics: 40 minutes!!!
Degree: None whatsoever
Fell Walking Leader's Certificate: None
First Aid Qualifications (to instructor level): None
Driving test: None
Football referee's exam: Absolutely none.
British Chess Federation Regional Coach's Award: None
Journalism qualification: Not a sausage
When I was teaching I'd always feel like a fraud when I urged most of my pupils to revise, but at least I was honest with the most able students. I simply told them that revision is largely a waste of time. If you didn't fully understand something first time around there's not much chance that it will make sense later on!
Chris
(PS: Most people I know who've obtained First Class Honours degrees attended well under half of their lectures and hardly ever opened a book during their university days!)
I agree that no amount of revision will help you to pass exams at degree level unless you have the intellectual capacity, but it is often useful to refresh the databank. Armed with that you can go into an exam room and weave a rich tapestry around the most trivial of data (I'm talking Arts, rather than Sciences here). One of the most boring aspects of being a teacher, especially at university level, is marking. Page after page of students regurgitating what they believe the lecturer wants to hear. Throw in a statement which runs counter to received wisdom, justify it with some specious sophistry, and his eyes will light up. You will get extra marks for sheer nerve, if nothing else. A story is told of the History department at my university (which awarded only one first class degree over a period of twenty years) where a lecturer awarded a very mediocre answer with a grade A. When asked to justify his marking at a moderators' meeting he replied, "He used a semi-colon, and correctly, too!"
Two (probably apocryphal) stories spring to mind.
Apparently, many years ago at one of the Oxbridge colleges, students were sitting down to their final exam in philosophy and were presented with the question "Is this a question?", to which one student replied "Yes, if this is an answer" and walked out.
Same exam, different year, the question was "What is courage?", to which one student replied "This!" and also walked out.
I also remember seeing a television programme about different levels of examination paper marking among different markers. One year, they asked a sample of markers to re-mark the papers they'd marked the previous year, and only one of them recorded exactly the same grades for exactly the same candidates. Apparently, all he did was measure the length of the answer papers with a ruler...
Apparently, many years ago at one of the Oxbridge colleges, students were sitting down to their final exam in philosophy and were presented with the question "Is this a question?", to which one student replied "Yes, if this is an answer" and walked out.
Same exam, different year, the question was "What is courage?", to which one student replied "This!" and also walked out.
I also remember seeing a television programme about different levels of examination paper marking among different markers. One year, they asked a sample of markers to re-mark the papers they'd marked the previous year, and only one of them recorded exactly the same grades for exactly the same candidates. Apparently, all he did was measure the length of the answer papers with a ruler...
I remember the philosophy one. As far as I remember it ran:
Q7. Is question 7 a valid question? to which the reply was:
"Only inasmuch as this is a valid answer".
I know it's at a lower level, but I still like this one (hope the link works)
http://blog.jimmyr.com/pics/162_1.jpg
Q7. Is question 7 a valid question? to which the reply was:
"Only inasmuch as this is a valid answer".
I know it's at a lower level, but I still like this one (hope the link works)
http://blog.jimmyr.com/pics/162_1.jpg
It works for me. Perhaps this link may clarify things (top one).
http://blog.jimmyr.co...m_Answers_13_2008.php
http://blog.jimmyr.co...m_Answers_13_2008.php
-- answer removed --